Tripartite Essentialism is built upon a set of assumptions and is technically a description of a complex system of natural laws.
1. The universe is in a state of absolute chaos and flux in both the macrocosm and the microcosm.
2. Order emerges out of chaos. [fusion] a Natural Law
3. Chaos emerges out of order. [entropy and fission]
4. Energy and matter and component particles can be described by wave theory, turbulence and the standing waves or particles take on harmonic and octal attributes.
5. There are no fixed universal constants in the macrocosm.
6. There are no fixed identical particles just classes of particle events with similar properties
7. All energy and matter is in a state of transference from high energy to low energy across a common medium i.e. A to B through C with the minimal intercession of some D.
there are 8 logically real versions of the integrity of that transaction at time1 and 64 at time2, further there are 27 modal logic/transitional states at time1 and 729 at time2
8. This transference can be universally modelled by an inverse square power law.
9. Every material and ergonomic system and event is unique but can be classified according to similar properties.
10. General Systems Theory called Tripartite Essentialism models every transference event outwith considerations of scale.
11. Tripartite Essentialism labels every system in the Universe with 3 attributes:
1. Ingredients [macro]
2. internal mechanics [meso]
3. qualitative [micro]
12. Every physical system has three components and each of the three components has 2 attributes.
2. Exogenous –
and this produces a total of six power laws inter-relationships with which to model every event in the material Universe.
13. Relativism and the power of analogy can strip away arbitrary labels and expose and model the exchanges that characterise every system at every scale.
14. A transfer of energy between two points or systems via a common intervening medium is a process called Osmosis. [a Universal state of affairs i.e. some A to some B through some common C]
15. The most basic and tautologically true of an infinite number of transfers of energy in the Cosmos of 3 dimensions of space and one of time is that between at least two systems.
e.g. Dr Plichta’s model of Tripartite Relativity ISBN 1-86204-014-1, pub element 1997 demonstrates that 3’ness is an archetypal and a priori state with the mathematics of prime numbers, and demonstrates that Structure emerges and evolves out of mathematical chaos.
16. This one basic transfer can be modelled by science in several ways.
a. Osmosis. i.e. The diffusion of a high concentration to an area of lower concentration through a semi-permeable membrane also as Fajan’s Rules of atomic Chemistry applied to the migration of electrons.
b. As a metaphysically continuous extension of one system into another, where the second system ‘Emerges’ out of the potential created by the activity of the first. e.g. Morphogenetic Attractor [Langton C], Evolutionary Vacancy [Goodwin B] – as a Field in Psychology [Lewin K] and electricity [Ohm’s Law, incorporating potential difference of energies as Voltage and resistance to the passage of energy from high to low potential.] and in Physical Chemistry, Fajans rules.
c. The relationship between the two systems can be empirically modelled by an inverse square power law i.e. The more one system increases in magnitude, the more the effect of the other system diminishes in turn. This can be more attenuated and imprecise at increasingly larger scales of relativity of mass.
d. A binary and tripartite arithmetic, can be used to model this transaction, where system A, system B and the common medium system C have a holistic relativity which can be represented as integrated or disintegrated in whole or part by 1’s or 0’s denoting on/off, extant/disabled [Boole G].
e. At any time 1, there can be eight essential states of that Tripartite Relativity. These ‘essences’ or ‘atomic state descriptions’ at time 2 can be any of the other eight. The number of possibilities for changes of state is modelled by a closed set of 64.
17. From this metaphysics can be derived an Essentialist Arithmetic with an unusual concept of zero, for zero in this system always has substance in relation to some context (unlike the Frege definition of decimal numbers by an empty set)
i.e. There is no absolute zero, and infinity is always a finite essentialist number in a limited and closed set. (This makes intelligent computing possible because the universe can be mapped without recourse to an infinity of labels. (the Turing recursion problem and also in Godel’s logical numbers) and domain maps of the universe made up from essentialist arithmetic and its TRE metaphysics maps without infinity are easily interchangeable – so that an AI is never stuck enumerating an infinity of labels.
18. The Cosmos and its energies are in a state of Chaos, and emerge systems that are ordered, but all energy and all matter and all time have the characteristics of Chaos – they are Non-Linear, both in the Macrocosm and the Microcosm. [Schiffler’s Horns paradox in mathematical topology.] A Chaos, harmonic and Fluid dynamics paradigm
19. The properties of emergence modelled here, are Telic. i.e. end based and suggests that Emergence doesn’t stop at causing system 2, but that successive systems emerge as part of an ongoing process.
20. Entropy and demergence are part of this dualistic process of Emergence, construction and destruction, but it is suggested [Langton and Kauffman in Levy S.] that this process of expansion and contraction occurs around a tendency to equilibrium e.g. the elements of Chemistry tend to transitional equilibrium states. These states may also be considered to be Complex states at the Edge of Chaos and the Edge of Structure and are self evolving and self-regulating.
21. There is a formal logic for the set of Essences producing various important languages; [T], [HX], [A], [G], [Ga], some of these language e.g. the language [A] are modal and model transitional states within transactions. E.g. 27 universal transactions at time 1 and 729 at time 2
22. These are limited and closed sets of Logically Real ‘atoms’ that are event descriptions between time1 and time2. Their enumeration is called ‘essential numbering’.
THE TRIPARTITE PRINCIPLE.
From a set of simple rules, and using the strong analogies generated, this holistic paradigm proposes many sought after answers – a way of seeing relativity and function in a holistic and also logical way.
A Universal Ohm’s Law and biological osmosis provide the model for all systems. All possess some bigger energy concentration donating to a lower energy concentration through the intermediary of common medium of relativity.
From within an umbrella of potential e.g. the potential difference between one site/event and another, energy passes or diffuses or discharges from a site of higher energy to one of lower energy and by that process creating the potential for another emergent system.
We must first formally classify Tripartite Essentialism within the Philosophy of Science.
Tripartite Essentialism is based upon the field theory notion that there is a continuous relation between one system and another through a common medium. i.e. A to B through some common C.
there are 8 logically real versions of the integrity of that transaction at time1 and 64 at time2, further there are 27 modal logic/transitional states at time1 and 729 at time2
To add to this idea is the notion of Emergence, where one more massive but less sophisticated system by its more massive scales of chaos(ether) in a higher energy state feeds into and – [emerges] another more sophisticated system in our time space.
This is accomplished by the transference of energy from the lesser evolved system to a site or niche of competition with another system in the same context.
The product of this transference of energy or discharge is some system or artefact that is said to have emerged or filled the vacancy created by evolution and competition.
In America at the Santa Fe Institute, the biological implications of this ‘vacancy’ were labelled as ‘Morphogenetic Attractors’.
This discharge or current occurs through a medium which offers resistance. There are three broad types of discharge from high to low energy.
The ‘electricity’ of this discharge/transaction varies in [T] as the 3 types of material complexity; where;
1. the alpha class i.e. idioms 1-3 convey energy as ether and
2. the beta class i.e. idioms 4&5 where energy is bound up in and invested in mechanics of an organic nature and the ‘electricity’ of the discharge between two poles becomes invested in systems more teleologically sophisticated than a mere trail of electrons. e.g. water, ions and hydrocarbons etc.
3. The gamma class, idioms 6-8, employ the two previous types of ‘Voltage’ but also includes the additional teleological sophistication of energy being further abstracted and manipulated by types of social artefact or information meta systems.
Easily measured in a simple format – as electricity, this tripartite format is known and measured in more complex, compound and crystallised (telic) energy substrates and organised and self regulating aggregates of matter – e.g. in psychological systems, which are relatively abstract systems (in comparison with a copper wire), the discharge of motivation has been measured by Lewin  – unconsciously using a Tripartite principle.
Kurt Lewin has developed this as a ‘Field Theory in Psychology’.
The Importance of Analogy.
Immanuel Kant, whose flawed 19th Century Critique of Teleology did not recognise that Biological systems had an intrinsic physical order that was part of the one basic ergonomic and evolutionary hierarchy – drew the line of demarcation between the ‘a priori’ knowledge of physics and mathematics and the messy biological stuff, whose aesthetic appeal seemed to delude us into thinking that it all made properly constituted mathematical sense simply because we had an expectation that it did so.
Analogy, however can model such fuzzy logic messes.
Osmosis can be used as an analogous modeling strategy for transference at all levels of material complexity from the atomic rules of Fajan, the electronic rules of Ohm, to the psychological rules of Lewin.
Osmosis is a biological term used to describe the active transport of salts from an area of high concentration to an area of low concentration through a semi-permeable membrane.
The basic premise is that any system is a ‘membrane’ between two others. This Meso role identifies the membrane as the attenuating artefact C in the [T] transaction process. A to B through common C
The structure and mechanics of membrane C pass on the ‘discharge’ to the site of systemic competition.
Energy flowing into or being fed into the locus of components that comprise a Tripartite system finds a condition of impedence to its flow; where the original stream becomes transmuted or metabolised into those substances or effects which maintain the system’s function, whether biological or physical.
Given a consistent, qualitative flow, the structure can specialise on the resources of its input to exploit systems ever more different and incongruous to the energy system from which it emerged. This factor is dependent on the stress imposed externally at the site of competition between this system and its context and the competing context into which the ergonomic ‘discharge’ is directed – for example in the story of the prehistoric evolution of amphibians where the developing respiratory mechanism of the organism enabled the exploitation of new habitat and context on the shore – this adaptation, initially, may have often failed under the critical stress of lack of humidity and high temperature.
In using biological concepts as tools to interpret more general physical systems, it becomes easier to visualise Tripartite systems living in habitats, eating, metabolising and competing in a world readily accessible to the senses, and in this way, the energy that is being processed and competed for, may be more easily tracked in terms of a biological analogy through the very accessible concept of organic holism.
A system becomes a system when a group of components are used consistently to receive and process energy. If consistency develops, it is because there is a context or input that caters for the collective needs of this group of components.
In the macrocosm, e.g. in a fish, after feeding, the organs metabolise the input and distribute the metabolites to every part of the organisation and organism where they are used in the process of growth, competition or maintenance.
Speaking more abstractly; this structure and mechanics or, supporting mechanism or metabolism, is an energy-distribution infrastructure, as often seen in civilisation as it is at the super-physical level. [Smith A, ‘An enquiry into the nature and causes of the Wealth of Nations, 1776] where fine tuning of a welfare (public interest) economics strategy with the systemization of economic and industrial benefits around the strategies of the open market allegedly produced a viable society. Industry and Society and Individuals who obtained the most benefit for the least cost allegedly would be ‘selected for’ in terms of a social and biological Darwinism. i.e.
A selection of the most efficient organisation. (as opposed to organism).
In treating Civilisation as part of the set of Organic Holism, it too has a brick and mortar body powered by the metabolite of electricity obtained in the competitive jungle of Capitalism.
The context of a Civilisation is its minerals, resources and materials and the processing capacity of the system itself is dependent on the efficiency of emergent tools, artefacts, processes and information with which raw materials are exploited e.g. farming, mining, factory and processing technology.
The ‘heart’ of the nuclear reactor, pumps sustenance along the veins and arteries of its power cables, and cognisant ganglia of the stock exchanges allocate lines of trade and communication, where secondary Capital metabolites are shipped through the enormous organic system of the infrastructure in a quest for sustained growth and competition for available resources according to stimuli or Labour Market Intelligence.
As in a biological system, the technological system processes and reprocesses raw input through a chain of useful and cumulative effects, investing time, capital and utility in these metabolic products.
The evolutionary assets of a Civilisation are information based, where the management and control of information leads through policy and science to the maximisation of output, for the minimum of input.
Sustained growth and metabolism, a necessity in an entropic
environment can only be maintained by the maximisation of inputs as a whole, and since the natural and universal power law is involved in the demographic and ergonomic cycles of growth and decay, the exponential demand on resources made by exponential consumption can only be maintained by correct and competitive scientific advance.
At this level of complexity, the Osmosis analogy includes many more sets of artefacts, systems and formats into which the energy discharge of the context macro has been encoded.
Here are a few more examples of ‘Tripartite Relativity’ .
Three parts and a context.
i.e. Context and Macro: CMacro, Meso, Micro. that use analogies to describe systems both in general terms but also in physical and empirical terms. These ideas use the biological ‘osmosis’ model to illustrate the transaction process between high energy objects and systems to low energy objects and systems.
Food, has as its context the Sun, which powers the green cycle
whose Meso DNA and coding for systematic organism turns the available Carbon, Nitrogen and Phosphor in the Macro into the Micro asset of Carbohydrate Sugars and Oxygen needed to sustain the plants.
This series of trophic and vegetational cycles produce a complex ecosystem and food web which becomes the macro that supplies components to another inhabitant, Man.
Man extracts for the benefits of the gastronomical structure and mechanics of Man, [his Meso] energy packets of variable quality and quantity.
His kitchen receptacle, when examined holistically with Tripartite Relativity has a macro or function that suits it for the context of the kitchen in design and purpose.
The size of the bowl, the energy facility of the umbrella that it provides to sustain its utility – the macro or utility for the conveyance of fruit is dependent on the Man’s social context.
The Meso of the bowl is basically its components and structural
constituents, e.g. molecular and crystalline integrity and tolerance etc, and the Micro of the bowl, basically, its evolutionary assets are its qualitative aspects e.g. if the purpose of the bowl was solely general utility, then plastic is an asset to enable continuity of function; if however, its quality is not selecting it to attain conditions of continual use e.g. porcelain bowl at a banquet may be more acceptable, then the Micro of the bowl is dependent on context conditions both qualitative and social and the amount of psychological pressure its system can ‘bring to bear’ or weather in the selection process.
The cupboard should, like the bowl, be seen in terms of the function that makes it a specific type of cupboard, and not necessarily seen in terms of the energies of its manufacture.
The cupboard is the end product (Micro) of a Sawmill (Meso) that manufactures to differing qualities from forests (Macro).
The context of the cupboard per se would be its overall capacity to perform its container function of holding utensils e.g. bowl.
Its Meso would be its structural arrangements and partitioning and fitments and the evolutionary assets or qualitative aspects – Micro, would be the social and physical qualitative difference between Oak and MDF Hardboard, and the structural tolerances and aesthetic qualities of plastic and brass.
A record player has a Macro of electricity, capital and the context and function of an information transformer.
The Meso or structure and mechanics of the hardware, its choice of; materials; circuit boards, their relative component complexity and arrangements, and additional attenuations, options and facility would also have a qualitative aspect Micro, both in social status and end product of HiFi.
A Book or other Media process, has as its context its topic, and a Macro also determined by the available information and physical formats and ingredients of its social source. Its Meso, or structure and mechanics are the ideologies or idea formats that collate and relate and present and explain the general relativity of the social artefact or information tool to its social context.
Whereas the evolutionary asset of the book, its Micro, would be how effective and intelligent an ideological tool it was for the exploitation of the resources of the context to which its main premise was applied.
A lampost has as its social context, the illumination of infrastructure for the purposes of efficient society etc, and as a Macro both the capital of taxation and the power of electricity and the facilitation of orderly social conduct, its Meso is the structure and components of the object itself, its concrete or metal, its wiring system and lighting components, and its qualitative aspects are mainly aesthetic in relation to how much light it provides, what colour, what morphology how socially designed, how high and the quality of both structure and function.
A Home has as its context the housing of a family unit for the purposes of labour maintenance within the context of the infrastructure – the family or Macro will maintain the input of capital, fuel, energies, supermarkets, reservoirs, petrol, and these will be utilised by the structure and mechanics of the social context, Meso, its market efficiency, its learning and reproductive and creative potential and the degree of intelligence and efficiency to be invested in and deployed in maintaining and sustaining the fabric and quality of the social environment.
The Qualitative aspects of home are related to capital input, class and other types of ideology of social fabric and aesthetic that enable evolution, expansion and successful stress free growth for the most benefit from the least cost. [Smith A, 1776]
The relativity of New Particle Physics can be demonstrated by an analogy with a musical instrument the body of which is comprised of sub-atomic etheric particles from whose Chaos Emerges a note or Particle.
Now if this analogy holds, using our five senses, we can see the subatomic particles in the world of colours and vision and ‘musical instruments’, but we can only hear the Particle ‘note’ within the idiom of sound and because emergence is not a widely understood process, the causative link between the idiom of particle production and the particle itself could not be explained by a reductionist theory which decontextualised the particle from its reason for being. Which is why Particle Physics is today in disarray with umpteen paradoxes and anomalies like 26 mathematical dimensions to explain a superstring etc.
This process of decontextualisation effectively removes a dimension or tier of relationships from rational thought because a monkey can be touched and verified and not the irrational metaphysical relationship between the monkey and the tree. Without Holism the study of the monkeys and particles is undecidable, for all the monkeys in the lab are lab monkeys, not forest monkeys in much the same way that all the particles in the particle zoo are lab particles out of the context of their natural habitat – natural relativity. What then is this canopy under which the particle zoo of bizarre hybrid particles flourish e.g. The basic laws of fluid dynamics can model energy as a fluid. It gets turbulent, the turbulence has peaks and troughs of intensity, areas of violent flux, and within this non homogenous mix, areas of calm and structure, the Strange Attractors that have become the temporary hybrid particles currently observed.
Much like the Gas Giant planet Jupiter has the characteristic Red Spot, the persistent – emerged from chaos – eye of a fluid storm, the basic and unique particles themselves exist by virtue of the storm in the aether of sub-atomic energies in the Cosmos, the flux of the Essences, and amidst this chaos emerge the calm islands or nodes which are the structural fruits of flux.
Philosophy of Science – notes
The synthesis upon ‘a priori’ fact in Tripartite Essentialism is a Phenomenological event in the world of labels, but the essential relativity of such events within the physical objects themselves belongs to a Logically Complete and closed set of relativistic functions – and those functions are responsible for the fact of the noun and its ingredients.
The epistemological status of Tripartite Relativity and its one basic field ‘law’ i.e. the inverse square law, that ties it into the operation of ‘natural’ and universal processes, comes from a continuous tautological relation between the components of the 3part system and their context: a discontinuous relation in this sense is a reductio, since it implies no relativity and hence no measurement or phenomenon. i.e. relativity is ‘a priori’ valid.
All materials generated by Tripartite Essentialist formalism belong to the one basic set of 64 atomic events which physically increment by gradual 64 transitions to the greatest level of structure at 64.
Tripartite Essentialism incorporates a field law, where a powers system is in continuous relation.
In metaphysics, to categorise Tripartite Essentialism with the three main classical types of individual metaphysical distinction, produces a bit of a quandry, for [TRE] embraces all three types.
The set of 64 Essential events and members are constituted Parmenidean individuals: changeless, permanent entities. The atomic stance that entails from this is that change can only come through their rearrangement.
The emergence of ‘structures for nothing’ from the Heraclitean ‘fires’ as it were is described by the generative theory of causality.
Where the cause is supposed to have the power to generate the effect and is connected to it.
Such cause in [TRE] has a natural law of emergence observable in a continuous field as an internal relation.
Whereas the succession theory of causality would hold that the phenomena observed are psychological synthesis, the ‘a priori’ element of the Tripartite atom creates a real connection between cause and effect and that this can be identified by a causal mechanism
e.g. using Ohm’s Law, a light bulb, and the application of a potential difference in energy relativity between the filament.
The Primary quality of Tripartite Essentialism [T] is energy transaction.
The ergonomic status of all systems, universally, is not fixed and is subject to arbitrary change or the rearrangement of the sets of atoms and processes that comprise the system.
The phenomenon of change gives rise to the secondary qualities associated with the Primary quality of flux.
For example the primary quality of Ohms Law electricity generates the secondary quality of light and heat. In [T] the primary quality of the universal energy power law of mass generatesthe secondary quality of gravity and time.
The emergent properties of flux can be defined in terms of: the property of the whole being produced by the properties of the parts, and that these emergent holistic properties derive from the whole structure and its context.