//
you're reading...
andrew hennessey, hitek, holism, interstellar, logic, operating system, paradox free, prolog, relativity, star trek, tripartite essentialism

Interstellar/Interdimensional Operating System

TRIPARTITE ESSENTIALISM

This is the 20 year anniversary of the Tripartite Essentialism discovery that makes advanced civilisation possible for Mankind.

I think God allowed me to have this knowledge (1991AD) so that I would know that it is possible to have all the star trek technologies on Earth now – without recourse to any scientific paradox or alien intervention. So that I would see through the charades of science and not be drawn into its worldly evils.

This article presents the basis of an operating system and computational platform which would potentially be at the heart of almost every gadget or device/ship you see on star trek.

The advanced semantics take the Turing and Goedel problems of the infinite and endless recursion out of computation and knowledge representation.
Basically using the invented knowledge representation system and three part metaphysics, we take every transaction in infinity and assign it to one of a limited and closed series of logical boolean transactions – and every noun, verb and adjective we have for anything can be so assigned. Then using the discovered naturally lawful 6 keys systems theory we build a model of each and every event – all events have 6 zones, within each zone we would create 6-part interacting components at various levels of detail by nesting a further 6 zones into 6 into 6 and etc until all the intrinsic detail of every interaction within the bigger event has a model.
Then we would use [HX] Assembler to model and manipulate the fine detail within these events.

This article comprises an introduction to tripartite essentialism.
Examples of how human activity and knowledge is made tripartite in format
A universal metaphysics for all such three-part exchanges
The language [HX] Assembler with which to model the fine detail and context of the exchanges.
An example of the language being used to model a biological event.

Twenty years ago I had developed a universal and unifying metaphysics based on natural laws and processes that were programmable and manipulable via a logic language I developed.

A folklore version of Tripartite Essentialism is taught as an irrationalist metaphysics degree by the Secret School of the Theosophical Society, although it requires a Hindu glossary to interpret. It is part of the occult body of work known only to a few, but is briefly referred to in the Theosophical Society’s exoteric work by HP Blavatsky called The Secret Doctrine volume 1 in the notes on the emergence from chaos in; ‘Logos, Outpouring and vehicles’.

Tripartite Essentialism as written today in 2011 remains as a body of domain independent notes that require a Philosophy of Science glossary to interpret.
Its products include a logical and programmable language resembling PROLOG called HX Assembler that also includes; emergence, transference and flux as inverse squared power laws.

An aether and chaos/emergence based particle physics that models a solution to the collapsing wave quantum paradox along the lines of Tesla’s Theory of Environmental Energy.
It has also produced the alleged Holy Grail of Artificial intelligence in that it models and overcomes the infinite recursion in computation and logic noted by Turing and Goedel that prevent fully executive robotics and therefore enables Artificial General intelligence.

Tripartite Theory also rationally models teleportation using complete and finite sets of essential processes to reproduce in infinite circumstances.
A scanning device was also conceptualised that would utilise data maps to borrow and exchange similar processes from different maps to fill in the unknowns. This alleged isomorphism between domains is another goal of Artificial Intelligence.

Before any of these alleged science fiction products could be had however, an initial expert system database with a reference system of empirical values for every object or class of object would have to be devised.

Tripartite Essentialism today in 2011 however remains as a series of fairly inaccessible domain independent self-referential notes which is why it also works as a self-contained lawlike general systems theory.
Any industrial translation into an application would initially at least require a consultation with the author.

Major breakthroughs based on this one ‘operating system’ became possible, overcoming the major scientific paradoxes central to the human condition.
The metaphysics I called ‘tripartite essentialism’ made possible a broad spectrum of technologies and applications seen most often ‘magically’ working in programmes like ‘Star Trek’. E.g.

Executive Robotics [Artificial General Intelligence]
Teleportation
Mind Machine Interfaces
Stargate Technology and Interdimensional Travel
Paradox-free Interstellar free energy engine
Medical diagnostic scanner
Space ships long range scanner with intelligent interpretation of any scenario
A Game Theory where ‘somebody wins everything’ e.g.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iCt3NKun2Eg

At the heart of the metaphysics (called tripartite essentialism) is the essence of every transaction in the universe at all scales and magnitudes. There are eight models of the one and only one universal transaction of the form A to B through a common context C

Ie.
Universally, logically, every transaction A to B through a common medium C can have eight and only eight forms of integrity at time 1
The story of Object A and how it functions is called ‘functional relativity’
Also Object A makes a donation of surplus energy in a competitive environment/context. A is a developed and sophisticated object or process that is capable of emerging or losing surplus from its investments or internal works C and this surplus B is its assets/qualities at B.
Energy flowing from higher to lower down a gradient of exchange through its internal structures A to B through common C

0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 A OBJECT High Frequency
0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 C PROCESS
0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 B QUALITY Low Frequency Surplus (Oogenic investment)

In any context for a physical event or process, the physical transaction can be modelled and categorised by its high frequency components that facilitate its low frequency qualities and assets e.g. its emerged assets/seeds/investments etc ie. the process is Oogenic.
All physical transactions take the form ACB

In tripartite metaphysics every object and event can be mapped out in natural language as noun verb and adjective of the type object process and quality/asset.
The metaphysics of a universal three part exchange is given below – followed by the language [HX] Assembler which can be used to model the fine details and context within each exchange.

This relativity of threeness in all natural objects of any scale the universe over can represent the nature and function of every object/event/process. Each object/event having its central core, A its governing mechanics and infrastructure C and its assets and organelles B.
Further each of the three zones of any object of [1. core 2. mechanics & infrastructure and 3. evolutionary assets] may be further subdivided into 2 parts – that part of the zone which specialises in maintenance – its endogenous aspect and also that part of the zone that specialises in externally driving the other zones in context – its exogenous aspect. Therefore every object in the universe has 6 key aspects.

To model natural complexity, nested large scale detailed models of 3 zone objects within 3 zone objects within 3 zone objects can be drawn up to describe more complex 3 zone objects.
Every 3 zone object with 2 aspects of exogenous and endogenous per zone actually has 6 aspects and they are all directly related by a series of inverse square power law relationships. In effect each 3 zone object has 6 key aspects and this has been developed into a theory called 6 keys system theory.
Every object, event, process, phenomenon the universe over at any and all scales has 6 key aspects.

This fact coupled with an object frequency database that ties every and all exchanges of energy (empirical values) to their category or domain of objects enables the ‘Star Trek’ applications listed above.

The development of this database is central and key to all the innovations.

Also with a limited and closed series of transactions (ACB) that can describe the processes within absolutely every event in the universe at all scales – this finite number of events produces (in context) a series of finite numbers for infinity.
Because the infinite and unknown is tamed both in energy equations and artificial consciousness by finite reference points then such things as teleportation devices like stargates would have no problem with re-assembling complex objects and people and no artificial intelligence would ever be stuck for an answer or analysis of the unknown. All of such things are enabled by this finite logical series called ‘essentialist arithmetic’.

On a planet hellbent on keeping us in a dark age there is obviously no hope for the development of such things under our Draconian Overlords who have made an issue out of farming us in imposed primitivism and spiritual dis-ease.

Maybe one day though in places beyond here – beyond the vision of endless sci-fi medievalism and disease and soul-less roboticism and materialism portrayed as ‘advanced civilisation’ – we may see the use of such wonders that could regulate and maintain the basic things in our collective lives to a very high degree of quality.
In one of the many mansions beyond here and the anunnaki and grey matrix.

Make no mistake though – these wonders are technically possible for mankind now without any demonic or psycho-alien help – without any alleged DNA treaties etc – without the need to squander lives and resources on alien whims or tyrannies …

It is only the physical key to our physical anunnaki prison – but to truly escape – only the love in our heart can lead us home to Christ.

In truth the good Angels have not let this knowledge flourish because it cannot free our souls. It might produce free energy, free robotics, free diagnostics, free conflict resolution, free travel but it cannot free our souls from the spiritual millstones of earth.

KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION

Turning social activity into tripartite transactions and Boolean logic via the tripartite essentialism metaphysics

There follows 3 examples [2.1 – 2.3] of the knowledge representation system.
This universal knowledge representation system [KRS]can take any idiom comprised of; nouns, verbs and adjectives as; objects, processes and qualities.
This [KRS] can be used to describe events at any scale and magnitude whether atomic or cosmic.
This set of examples uses small business and their activity classified with this 3 part semantic system and its aspects called; [object/noun] Macro, [process/verb] Meso, [quality/adjective] Micro.

2.1. Arts – Music and Multi-Media
2.2 Industrial Manufacturing – Light Engineering
2.3 Service – Insurance

MACRO. THE PHYSICAL/ATOMIC COMPONENTS OF
THESE BUSINESSES ARE AS FOLLOWS.
e.g. 2.1.- MACRO/OBJECT. fiddle, harp, keyboards, studio recording components, sound mixing facility, strings, CD/Tape duplicator, Minidisk, P.A. System, Transport, music stand, instrument case, tuner, lights, lighting desk, compressor, pre-amp, effects processor, microphones, stands, computer, software, peripherals
etc.

e.g. 2.2 – MACRO/OBJECT. lathe, metals, cutter, sweeper, shop floor clothing, gear and boots, tools, bench, drill, workshop, first aid box, lighting, storeroom,
drawing/stencil board and printer, oxy-acetylene torch, arc, welding gear, trolleys, coolant, polisher/buffer, chemical solutions etc.

e.g. 2.3 – MACRO/OBJECT. car, clothing, suit, PC, mobile phone, hard copy filing system, stationary, photocopier, Office, computer and network peripherals, petrol, audio-visual presentation kit, overhead projector, whiteboard, laptop and modem, office furniture, briefcase, clients, customers, leaflets, potential
customers etc.

MESO. THE PRODUCT & MEDIA/PROCESSES AND INFRASTRUCTURE OF THESE BUSINESS
‘SYTEMS’/OBJECTS ARE AS FOLLOWS.
e.g. 2.1 MESO/PROCESS/INFRASTRUCTURE. – albums Celtic, albums rock, albums dance, albums story, multimedia books on CD on mysticism, hard copy tune books, logic audio recording software, concerts, performance and events supplied and tours done by company bands, new midi instruments invented, ambient and meditational video and audio’s, technical papers on new musical theories, interactive CD-ROM and multi-media package on Philosophy for Children, secure website for sale of soundfiles and other product.

e.g. 2.2 MESO/ PROCESS/INFRASTRUCTURE. – oil rig parts, ship parts, motor parts, alloy parts to industrial specifications, hard alloy, soft alloy parts, thermophilic
alloy, civil infrastructure components turned by spec to order, trawler maintenance, car and lorry structural repair, ad hoc building and roof components designed and manufactured by consultation.
e.g. 2.3 MESO/ PROCESS/INFRASTRUCTURE. –
domestic surveys, commercial property surveys, domestic and commercial policies, PEP’s, Equity Investment, stock brokerage, actuary and risk assessment, bank and investment portfolios, building society and investment house policies and procedure,
capital returns for business and client, Leaflets and advertising packages – multi-media, TV, radio, cinema, etc

MICRO. QUALITATIVE ASPECTS OF THESE PROCESS DESCRIPTIONS
e.g. 2.1 MICRO/QUALITY. – Original music/ various and diverse idioms, original story, cutting edge web site, diverse – one stop catalogue, secure for E-commerce
and credit card transactions, high quality international & high tech delivery company used
e.g. 2.2 MICRO/QUALITY. – parts to order, small runs – fast turnaround, good service and maintenance backup, high skill level, One-Off’s, diverse projects, great
experience

e.g. 2.3 MICRO/QUALITY. – proven track record on investment/stock portfolio, good payout and premium record, speedy and efficient processing of clients
needs.

The Metalanguage [T]
There follows eight process descriptions for the eight tripartite
‘Boolean atoms’ /transaction models of the language [T].
These form the basis of a metaphysics for universal exchanges at all scales.
These metaphysical descriptions are the large scale process models for every transaction – and the language [HX]Assembler given afterwards can be used to model the fine detail of the exchanges.

1. MACRO = 0, MESO = 0, MICRO = 0.
In the system, all is in flux and there is no relativity or
congruence between the context, the object and its activities.
There is currently no contextual environment for the
development, redevelopment or continuation of any system
and the qualitative aspects of evolution within this dissonance
have no emergent aspect that can be measured at this time
according to current empirical process.

2. MACRO = 0, MESO = 0, MICRO = 1.
The limited integrity of the past has had the qualitative
capacity to emerge an asset, the Micro, but at this time now,
(presently at timeX), the system has no systemic integrity. The
emerged asset, though, having persisted from a previous time
interlude is currently of high quality and integrity.

3. MACRO = 0, MESO = 1, MICRO = 0.
The lack of supply of systemic precursors caused by the
discontinuity within the context has had no detrimental effect
at this time, timeX, on the integrity of the persistent systemic
mechanics. The facilitation of systemic growth, though, by the
Meso, has ceased because of this lapse in the supply of
precursors to the systemic mechanism and therefore no new
assets and tools have been produced for the evolution of the
system.

4. MACRO = 0, MESO =1, MICRO = 1.
The lack of systemic equilibrium and integrity due to the
collapse of the precursor supply to the equilibrium from the
aggregates of the context has not interrupted the integrity or
persistence of the mechanical attributes within the system at
timeX as it continues to emerge asset.

5. MACRO = 1, MESO = 0, MICRO = 0.
At timeX, the present, an integrated supply of systemic
precursors has emerged as an event, the Macro, but has no
telic properties at timeX such that any new mechanical
attributes have organised or have had such time that would
have produced a qualitative asset as per conditions of
observation.

6. MACRO = 1, MESO = 0, MICRO = 1.
At timeX, the present, an integrated supply of systemic
precursors [Macro], have emerged a qualitative event [Micro] –
though the mechanics that supplied it were transparent to
observation.

7. MACRO = 1, MESO = 1, MICRO = 0.
At timeX, the present, the contextual supply of systemic
precursors to the emergent mechanics of the Meso and its
self-regulating equilibrium is of insufficient gradient, velocity
and content to produce a measurable qualitative asset of any
integrity under the assumed contextual conditions.

8. MACRO = 1, MESO = 1, MICRO = 1.
At timeX, the present, a fully emergent, self-regulating system,
producing assets of measurable qualities through viable
mechanical integrity is observed to conform to the criteria of
judgements imposed by the observations and criteria of
systemic success.
The eight descriptors, the eight tripartite atoms of the
language [T] at time1, describe an event deltaT at time2,
producing a set of 64 logically real essential numbers that are
unique state descriptions fully describing every change of
systemic integrity at time1 and time2.
The one rule of assumption that drives this set of rules of
derivation is that in all (universal) cases, a larger system of
aggregates, universally and autonomically contributes to a
smaller system through a common medium with also the
intercession of at least a common other.

THE LANGUAGE [HX].

INTRODUCTION: These operands are the keys to every natural
process in every system. They can be platformed on e.g. C++,
PROLOG, and even MIDI programming as list structures,
velocity and decay form a vital part of field theory and
empiricism or within Dc electrical engineering applications such
as ORCAD.
Characters include the Operands of Sentential and Predicate Calculus – the Languages [L] and [P], TheTripartite Languages [T], and [A] and symbols from the Microsoft Western Keyboard Fontset.

01. Unconditional Declarations e.g. If M then P1 where M
and P and 1 are the alphanumeric Microsoft Western fontset
utilising previously known data and previously agreed rules.
02. £ If M then not Q where not is £. i.e., £Q is not Q
03. >> if M, then it always follows that P1 is predicated,
i.e. M >> P1.
04. >= greater than or equal to
05. > greater than
06. allegedly not relative [an ‘a priori’ false premise]
07. <= less than or equal to
08. > ?Z, the conditions
for relativity ‘a priori’ exist though may not at this time be
active.
(with a social agreement on what is ‘similar’)
In holistic modeling, the Object and the Context have differing
concentrations and differing priorities for the same compound.
Thus by identifying where the highest concentrations are
within the model – the relativity of exchange can be more
easily tracked.

28. ~1X where ~1 identifies the macro ingredient X
29. ~2X where ~2 identifies the meso ingredient X
30. ~3X where ~3 identifies the micro ingredient X
31. [eT 01.. 64] or [eA 001.. 729] are essential numbers e for
[T] and [A].
32. t1, t2, t3, . etc where t = states relative interludes of
observation.
33. * where ~1X* and ~2X* identifies the same X in 2 etc. in
continual contexts of e.g. object, environment, transference
etc.
34. !X where transference velocity can be; !3 macro, !2 meso,
!1 micro.
35. X where conditions of over-sufficiency are being met for
the emergence of a new copy or asset of X.
36. the feeding gradient [@f] for systemic (object) growth. [@g]
i.e. [@f] $ [@g] = [+?], a directly related persistent field.
37. the Macro toll gradient. [@t], energy for context selfdefence.
[@d]
i.e. [@t] $ [@d] = [+?], a directly related persistent field.
38. the system feeding gradient [@f] and the macro toll
gradient [@t], however, are inversely proportional and directly
competitive to the point of mutual exclusion.
i.e. [@f] $$ [@t] = [+?]. (inverse power law).
39. English separators for associative listing 1. the comma (,)
and 2. the fullstop (.) as end of list.
40. English semi-colon (;) allows for an antecedent bracketed
listing of arbitrary labels from social processes in various
object and domain libraries.
41. English inverted commas (” X) signify degrees of
structural complexity – where “1 is simple, “2 is medial, and “3
is highly complex.
42. =:= Over-sufficiency, such that (+?X), a positive
transference gradient for the feeding of system X is of such
persistent abundance as to facilitate the emergence of
replication or higher degrees of complexity and emergent
systemic behaviour.
43. //# Extraneous, unexpected, migratory, modal
competition during: ?, -?, +?,
e.g. scales of: ~1//#X, ~2//#X, ~3//#X, and, X = (x1, x2, x3 … xn.)
44. {G}X, {L}X : where {G} is a global context and {L} is a
local context relative to some system X.
45. £$+ : the threshold level for systematic change and
consistency in material proportions and behaviour.
46. %%X : where X is a general systemic organic process in
which a matrix of osmotic processes of various relative
transference velocities interact in various transactions of
various scales and complexities.
47. =%%X : where X is a systemic process of empirically
defined normative tolerances, attributes and values.
48. [SV] : shuttle value, where an organismic packet of defined
ergonomic value (niche) is driven and empowered by largescale
changes of state and energy.

THE UNIVERSAL BIOLOGICAL ANALOG.
This model is built around the use of atmospheric pressure to deliver water to the plant biology using the transpiration stream up the xylem caused by leaf metabolism and the osmotic uptake of (biologically) necessary ion aggregates from the soil by centripetal ion activity in shoots and roots.
From Chapter 2 where we first looked at the Biological transference Model – we have a framework example with which to now operate a more complex description at the level of a systems theory.
01. If the context aggregates Q and their changing attributes with time &Q are available as Q to the DNA script propagating to exploit them, then the evolutionary driver from Q that is Z will arrive in the plant system S at time1.
With systemic structures, macro aggregate defences and enforced adaptive tolerances against usual macrotic chaos, and bridging activities with which to exploit the macro intact, the water transport system conveys the ionic packets to the plant envelope and its metabolism.

where (?S) is the plant seed system and Q = environment aggregates
1a. @ Q >> #Q = ~1S, t1
1d. &t, t2 >> (~1Z = (=:=Z) + (“3Z + !3Z))
1c. t2 = Q[@t]Z $ Q[@d]Z
1d. &t, t3 >> ((?S) + (+?S) = (=:=S)
02. The plant system S uses and mutates transport system Z and has successfully incorporated and exploited ?Z in this environmental context. Successful self-assembling aggregate S has enfolded and maintained a Z supply vacuum that exploits the process of evaporation from the tolerances within the soil and vegetation types and the changes in air temperature and pressure.
S has embedded itself in a persistent opportunity between massive
scalar differences in the macro aggregates.
Low S in the macro aggregates is feeding the assembly and emergence of high S within the plant because it is being pulled and transported by the greater and more physically abundant and reactive high Z in the macro aggregates across a massive scalar divide to massively low Z (atmosphere) in Q.
2a. &t, t4 = ((~1Z + ? + &Z) % (Q + &Q)) >>
2b. >> ( Z >> (+?S(&Z)) + (+?S(-?Z)))
2c. ~1QZ = (~1!3QZ* + ~1SZ*!2) = (+?SZ)
2d. [@f] $ [@g]
03. IF context C (atmosphere activity prevalent), where C % Q, and is greater than or equal to biological and physical plant tolerances – Optimum O, then some water Z plus other ion attributes M will be moved into the plant cytoplasm L in the plant system S at time1.
3a. S % (C % Q), t4,
3b. Q = !3Z = ?Z
3c. ((C>= O*) >> ~1+?Z + (~3*!2ZM = L) ~2S* + !3ZS ) >>
3d. >> (+?(#Z + #~2M) >> ~2L) >> ~2S*)
3e. >> (&~1Z % !~3SQ, t4)
04. Piggy-backed on the massive scalar processes (e.g. physics and physical energies) interchanging in the groundwater, hydrosphere and aeolosphere, ionic components essential for plant growth and oversufficiency create the possibility of evolutionary asset or fruit.
e.g. Plant metabolism: ~1S >> ~3S, where S in ~3S is the process
replication description called biological DNA, M = migrating ions, L =
cytoplasmic envelope at time n.

i.e. the central systemic manufacturing process of S that creates the subset (s1 .. s3) in order of; macro, meso, micro and also of scale is:
S = (s1, s2, s3).
In plants, these processes have primary components of operational capacity that is predicated upon structures utilizing: s1 = protein base,
s2 = sugars, s3 = phosphate predicated.
4a. Q = =:=MZ, t1
4b. S = (s1, s2, s3)
4c. S + t2 + +?Q~2M = (L = (#~3M + S) + Z) = ~3S = (?S)
4d. (?S) = [@f] $ [@g]
05. In the ground G, in good conditions, the seeds start to sprout. The emergence of the external structure of the plant, E, where E % S, and includes the superstructure of the foliage F, and xylem X: – is driven by aeolian A, and phototrophic P, dictates.
Persistence of temperature and light and moisture and low air pressure and low turbulence will produce an over-sufficiency O, (=:=), of growth
and therefore fruit. (?S).
5a. IF ~1S + (?S) % G + (+?~1Z^) + (+?P^) + (+?A^), t1 >>
5b. >> (?S) + ~2S + ~2Z + (+?S) + (“1S) = t2.
5c. t2 = ((L = (#M + #S) + ~2Z)) $$
5d. $$ = (E = (#A + #P + ~2Z^ + F + #M) + ~3Z))) = t2.
5e. t2, IF (+?~1Z) >> ( ((L = [@f]) $$ (E = [@t])) = t3)
5f. t3 >> (+?S = (+?~2Z) + (+?~3Z)) =
5g. = (#~2MFs* + #~2MXs* + (#S(#s1, #s2, #s2), t2) + #”2S) + ~3Z.
5h. membranes roots and leaves and relative seasonal velocity
5h. t4 = +?S (s1 >> s2 + #s3) + (#”1SFX + #”2SFX) + //#
5i. t5 = +?S(s1 + s2 >> s3) + (#”2SFX + #”3SFX) + //#
5j. t6 = +?S(s1 + s2 + s3) >> (“3SFX >> (?3S) + IF£ //#)
5k. t7 = -?S( £=:=(s1 .. s3)) +V (//#)

06. At the boundaries of various membranes and other transitional zones used in ‘osmosis’ by aggregates, there is a relatively normative systemic toll to be paid falling within the usual tolerances of the selfregulating and self-replicating physical system.
e.g. A to B through some common C with the intercession of at least some common D.
However, migratory aspects of adjacent chaos can introduce other modalities and scaling conflicts into the object – context relationship.
i.e. A to B through some common C with the intercession of some D that causes destructive distortion in the systemic structure, t1.
Although the systemic resistance exists, depending on the degree of physical impact on the systemic defences and tolerances there will be a gradual shutdown until cessation and de-contextualisation ensues, t3.
e.g. drought. (S = Plant System, Z = Pluvial and Fluvial Water)
6a. t1 = (+?~3//#~2S) + (-?!1~1Z)
6b. t2 = (?~2//#~1S) + (-?!1~1Z)
6c. t3 = (~1//#£S) + (-?!1~1Z)
07. The Plant System suffers context disruption in its feeding gradient and its metabolic bridging activities and transference gradient are compromised.
Where S = (f1 .. f5), and f1;XXX and Q = (t1 .. t6) and t1;XXX are numeric values; 001 – 999. for the purposes of empirically measuring relative wavelength and frequency for the construction of social information and artifacts.
7a. +?QS, t1
7b. t1 = S([@f] $ [@p]) $$ Q([@t] $ [@d]) = [@f] $$ [@t]
7c. t2 = ~2//#S >> S(f1;075, f2;153, f3;125, f4;092, f5;085) + (£f2;153)
7d. t3 = (?~2//#~1S) + (-?!2~3Z)
7e. t2 = S(f;)(075, 000, 125, 092, 085)
7f. t4 = ?Q[@t] >> Q(t;)(t1; 150, t2;112, t3; 000, t4; 000, t5; 017, t6; 443)
7g. t5 = IF “3~3S >> (~3//#S V ~2//#S) = (-?~3S)
7h. t5 = IF “1!1~1S >> (~1//#£S)
7i. t5 = “3~3S >> (f1 + f2 + f3) £$$ (t1 + t2 + t3 + t6) = (&t£=:=)
7j. t5 = f;(075 + 000 + 125) = f;200, $$t;1:2 = (//#~1!S) = (f;red)
7k. t6 = ~1S(f;red) >> (f; tripartite biology domain, massive heating)
7l. t6 = //#~1S(f; geo-drought, dehydration rupture, red distortion)
7l. t0 = f;(075 + 153 + 125) = f;353, $$t;1:3 = (+?~3″3!3S) = (f;blue)
7m. t0 = f;(blue, UV) >>
7m. t0 >> (f; tripartite physics domain, diffuse atmospherics, less plant red into photosynthesis, more blue/yellow and less red/green, greater xanthophyll and less chlorophyll).
7n. t7 = IF (+?~3″3!1S) = t1 = (£f2;000) >>
7o. t7 >> //#S = //#f(~1f + ~2f + ~3f) = % Q
7p. t8 = (“2~2f2;000) + //#f >> (~1″1f2;160) = ?S
7n. The scale of f2 needed by S is nested in the larger ecosystem Q, which feeds (+?) the metabolic meso (~2S) through various layers of filtration and transportation mechanisms (“3 V “2). These eventually substantiate (=:=) the emergence of fruit or other replications, (~3S).
e.g. [HX] syllogism.
7q. t9 = //#-?£f2[@d] + //#f(~1f + ~2f + ~3f) + (//#”2!1Q) >> £S V £#S
7r. t9, IF //#f;XXX = t;XXX + ~3″3!1S + £f2 >> ?S V +?S
08. The system having been breached by migratory chaos if sufficiently sturdy, complex, well stored and developed may be able to cope with variable distresses within the new orientations of the context.
If it does or does not, however, is entirely unpredictable and arbitrary, as physical conditions accrue and emerge and de-merge with time and with the influence of more global activities. Some examples of systemic states for S are given below at time13 and intimations for what may or may not be possible. t13, (8g. – 8x.) for example massive scale velocity transference on massively complex, massively storing
systems versus relative damage on similar systems in low scale velocity transference on simple and relatively unfortified systems. A few examples iterate the possibility of complexity and detail within the plant system

8a. SQ = S([@f] $ [@p]) $$ Q([@t] $ [@d]) = [@f] $$ [@t]
8b. t9 = ~2//#S >> S(f1;075, f2;153, f3;125, f4;092, f5;085) + (£f2;153)
8c. t9 = (?~2//#~1S) + (- !3~3Z) + (~3//#+?~1!”3Q)
8d. t10 = S(f;)(075, 000, 125, 092, 085)
8e. t11 = //#-?£f2[@d] + //#f(~1f + ~2f + ~3f) >> (£#S) + (?S) + (+?S)
8f. t12 = #S % ~1[@t]”3!3~1S + (~3//#+?~1!”3Q) + //#f(~1f + ~2f + ~3f)
8g. t13 = #S + //#f;(~1f) >> ~1!1″1-?£S + (?S) = S at timeN
8h. t13 = #S + //#f;(~1f) >> ~1!1″2-?£S + (?S) = S at timeN
8i. t13 = #S + //#f;(~1f) >> ~1!1″3-?£S + (?S) = S at timeN
8j. t13 = #S + //#f;(~1f) >> ~1!2″1-?£S + (?S) = S at timeN
8k. t13 = #S + //#f;(~1f) >> ~1!2″2S + (?S) V (+?S) V (£S) = S at timeN
8l. t13 = #S + //#f;(~1f) >> ~1!2″3S + (?S) V (+?S) V (£S) = S at timeN
8m. t13 = #S + //#f;(~1f) >> ~1!3″1S + (?S) V (+?S) V (£S) = S at timeN
8n. t13 = #S + //#f;(~1f) >> ~1!3″2S + (?S) V (+?S) V (£S) = S at timeN
8o. t13 = #S + //#f;(~1f) >> ~1!3″3S + (?S) V (+?S) V (£S) = S at timeN
8p. t13 = #S + //#f;(~1f) >> ~2!1″1S + (?S) V (+?S) V (£S) = S at timeN
8q. t13 = #S + //#f;(~1f) >> ~2!1″2S + (?S) V (+?S) V (£S) = S at timeN
8r. t13 = #S + //#f;(~1f) >> ~2!1″3S + (?S) V (+?S) V (£S) = S at timeN
8s. t13 = #S + //#f;(~1f) >> ~2!2″1S + (?S) V (+?S) V (£S) = S at timeN
8t. t13 = #S + //#f;(~1f) >> ~2!2″2S + (?S) V (+?S) V (£S) = S at timeN
8u. t13 = #S + //#f;(~1f) >> ~2!2″3S + (?S) V (+?S) V (£S) = S at timeN
8v. t13 = #S + //#f;(~1f) >> ~2!3″1S + (?S) V (+?S) V (£S) = S at timeN
8w. t13 = #S + //#f;(~1f) >> ~2!3″2S + (?S) V (+?S) V (£S) = S at timeN
8x. t13 = #S + //#f;(~1f) >> ~2!3″3S + (?S) V (+?S) V (£S) = S at timeN
8y. t13 = #S + //#f;(~1f) >> ~3S = (?S) V (+?S) V (£S) = S at timeN
8z. t13 = #S + ~1//#f(~1f) >> #S((-?S) V (?S) V (+?S) V (£S)) = S at timeN
8aa. t13 = #S + //#f(~2f) >> #S((-?S) V (?S) V (+?S) V (£S)) = S at timeN
8ab. t13 = #S + //#f(~3f) >> #S((-?S) V (?S) V (+?S) V (£S)) = S at timeN
8ac. t14 = #S + //#f(~2f) >> #~2S = S at timeN

09. Macro Toll Gradient [@t] is an energy toll of previously established physical and social parameters measured in and pertaining to the observed context between time1 and time2.
When contextual disaster strikes though, tolerances within the system break down and release numerous breakdown products from aspects of the system and new environmental context that interfere and mix with and disrupt (or augment) previously working and stable physical relationships. e.g. ~1//#S, t1.
In normative circumstances: Context Q $ S >> S([@d] $ [@t])
In abnormative disruption :
9a. t15 = //#Q $ //#S, #S >> = ?S(f2;153) at timeN
9b. t15 = £S + (//#(S[@d])) = ?S(f2;153) at timeN
Within the damaged system, possibilities for recombination of simples
(n) represent at the damage interphase until the unique physical tolerances of the damaged zone are either superceded and disintegrated or useful recombination and structural attenuation can present enough bridging material to repair the systemic defence [@d]
such that the feeding gradient from the systemic metabolism can
support [@t] the abnormative structural distress.
Two similar but differently scaled systems may fare differently in a chaotic context disruption of similar magnitude. No modeling assertion could be absolutely true in a chaotic universe though.
examples s1 and s2, where s1(mature) + s2(young) % S
s1 = !3ZS(~1X”3~1F”2) mature plant in emergent growing season
s2 = !3ZS(~3X”1~3F”1) young plant in emergent growing season
9a. t14 = //#-?£f2[@d] + //#f(~1f + ~2f + ~3f) >> (£#S) + (?S) + (+?S)
9b. t14 = #S % ~1[@t]”3!3~1S + (~3//#+?~1!”3Q) + //#f(~1f + ~2f + ~3f)
In this system S, values for fn at; macro (~1fn) = 500 – 1000
meso (~2fn) = 50 – 100
micro (~3fn) = 1 – 10
In the context //#Q, however, disruption at (~1fn) has caused systemic failure such that the velocity of the normative rate of supply is now insufficient to supply enough systemic defences to slow down the rate of systemic disintegration.
Some complex systems can still function and retain some damage within their structure.
In the context Q, normatively, the upper and lower tolerances of
competition on [@d], lie within the range of [800 – 1200] where [<1000]
is prevalent. e.g. 1:10 aggregates in context lie in the range [1001 –
1200]
This 1:10 entropy ratio ~3!S would define normative existence within context Q for S.
Also 1:10 aggregates in Q, used by S to make ~1S lie within the range
[1 – 499].
In the context //#Q, however, this ratio has changed; e.g.1
Contextual disruption of Q has led from a normative ~3!S; (1:10), to a
systemically damaging, ~1!S; (1:100 – 1:1000), tn.
9c. t15 = //#S + fn =<~2f2 + +?[@f] + (#S + ?S) – S(~1//#!1"1fn)
9d. t16 = //#S + fn + fn =<~2f2 + +?[@f] + (#S + ?S) – S(~1//#!1"1fn)
9e. t17 = //#S + fn + fn + fn =<~2f2 + +?[@f] + (#S + ?S) – S(~1//#!1"1fn)
9f. t18 = //#S + fn + fn + fn + fn =<~2f2 + +?[@f] + (#S + ?S) –
9f. t18 = – S(~1//#!1"1fn).
9g. t19 = //#S + fn + fn + fn + fn + fn => #S + //#Q = (#fn=> @fn(+1fn)tn. =< ~2f2.
9h. t20 ~2f2 + (+?[@f] + (#S + ?S) – S(~1//#!1"1fn))
9i. t21 = //#S + 7(fn) + =< (#fn=<~2f2,tn) + (#S + ?S) – S(~1//#!1"1fn)
9j. tn = //#S + 8(fn) + =< (#fn=> £S) V (#//#Q >> #S(s1.x));(S,phenotypes,
10a. tn = properties.x)
10b. t23 = !1ZS(~1X”3~1F”1), xs1.1;(deluge, mature root and xylem,
10b. t23 = bad foliage).
10b. t23 = !1ZS(~1X”2~1F”3), xs1.2;(deluge, mature root and xylem,
10b. t23 = excellent foliage).
10b. t23 = !1ZS(~1X”1~1F”1), xs1.3;(deluge, mature/decayed root
10b. t23 = and xylem, bad foliage).
10c. t24 = @//#Q = (-?s(1.1 + 1.2)) V (?s(1.1 + 1.2)) + £(s1.3)
10d. t25 = @//#Q!1Z >> S = (£X)x;(deluge, root dislocation, £[@f])
10e. t25 = IF @//#Q = t26 >> (s1.2 > s1.1) + (!1~1Z) + #(?s(1.2>1.1))
10f. t25 = IF @//#Q = t27 >> (s1.2 1.2))
10e. t26 = !1Z@//#QSs >> #~3Q,x;(optimum temperature and light,
10e. t26 = £[@f])
10f. t27 = !1Z@//#QSs >> #~1Q,x;(extreme temperature and light, £[@f])
10g. t27 = f2 % &Q = (q1, q2, q3, q4, Q(1-n), ~1Z) > @(~2S + ~3S)
10h. t27 = #(~1S) = f2 % (q1, q4)
10i. t27 = @Q % &W = (W1, W2, w1, w2, w3, w4 …wn)
10i. t27 = W;(tectonics, volcanism, tsunami) = &Q(~1!1{G} + ~1!1{L})
10i. t27 = W;(Richter, Geochemistry, Salinity + Temp) >> $$[@t]s
10j. t28 = W1 $$ W2 >> @//Q (q1 $$ q4) >> f2 + (&~1!1″1Q) + (#QSs)
10k. t28 = (!1W1 $$ !1W2 >> =:= {G}@w + #{L} >> (q1 $$ q4)
10l. t29 = #~3{L} >> #~3(f2) >> #{L}Ss = (=:= + ?Ss)
The objects and labels within this event description are interchangeable between similar events in different domains.
E.g. function, malfunction, systemic integrity and disintegrity in the ‘fruiting’ process in other systems and outcomes.

About ScottishAndrew

Contemporary Scottish fiddle player, Scottish ceilidh dance caller, folk music composer, Ufologist, natural and supernatural photographer and tour operator, digital artist and designer, writer and columnist - interested in cosmology and 5th generation computation without the 'Halting problem' !! THE SCOTTISH ANDREWVERSE Ceilidh musician and man of dance Investigator of paranormal circumstance Composer of art and pictures and tunes And researcher of old Scottish stones and runes Cosmic conundrums and landing on the Moon ...

Discussion

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 265 other followers

Flickr Photos

%d bloggers like this: