Isaiah 51:9 Awake, awake, put on strength, O arm of the LORD; awake, as in the ancient days, in the generations of old. Art thou not it that hath cut Rahab, and wounded the dragon?
Because the activity of the evil one and his fallen servants in our lives drives us down to the level of the beast – driven by our sexual hormones and alleged sexual imperative and mores we become easily mappable by evil aliens in the Artificial Intelligence of the Grey/Anunnaki Matrix.
Here presented is the science that illustrates the existentialist and biochemical reality in animals and also man when stripped of his Christ-like divine grace and driven down the frequencies to the animal. The basis of Biological and Psychological robotics are here presented as a Mind Kontrol 101 paper.
It is a vision of biochemical continuism – a cause and effect human biochemical and existentialist reality utilising extracts from research papers. The intention is to illustrate the physical level of human life to which we are being collectively driven down – a base line of chemical cause and effect.
You will see references to human behaviour that illustrate this cause and effect biochemical relativity, driven by hormones and environmental interaction.
The scientific quotes in this paper illustrate the idea that there is a level of biological and biochemical cause and effect for humans – the idea that because of material [not spiritual] relativity humanity can be seen to be operating a biological behavioural continuum or field.
and within that landscape of biochemical markers and transfers, each individual mines out the peaks and the troughs of energy investment/assets with the tools of society e.g. hardware, software, language etc
I even have a 3 part language or metaphysics that makes encoding even this totally possible.
This reference to [T] relativity, 3 part or tripartite relativity – basically everything in the universe exchanges via A to B through some common C in some context is also an Illuminati systems theory probably used by the Naga in the cities under Tibet. Rediscovered by myself in 1991, it is alluded to in volume 1 of the Secret Doctrine of Blavatsky in terms of Logos, Vehicles and Outpourings. Seen also in Hindu terminology in a Secret School degree dated 1921 in Edinburgh, it had in green ink on it – in the event of my death please destroy.
Seeing that affirmed my own research into threeness and the metaphysics of my threes were; e.g. noun, verb, adjective or object, process, quality.
It was the perfect field theory but then it was a natural and universal law.
For the threeness to apply to human biology and psychology however, there had to be a continuous driving – like a field in operation, though in human reality it was driven by conditioning to respond and behave in certain ways by appealing to the human sexual and hormonal paradigm.
What follows is the biological science of sexual driving – a continuous human and human animal field of activity relative to a biological and soulless way of being.
It is the lowest common denominator in all human reality – it is what we must strive with all our heart and mind and spirit and soul to avoid, by loving the Lord our God.
If the aliens keep driving us down with tribal animaistic stuff our minds and spirits descend into these fleshy biochemical pits and their consequences where we can be easily controlled and harvested.
In Christ there is escape from alien programming – for when we have the connection and grace – we go into stealth mode relative to the aliens.
John 3:8 The wind bloweth where it listeth, and thou hearest the sound thereof, but canst not tell whence it cometh, and whither it goeth: so is every one that is born of the Spirit.
Without the grace of Christs divine pattern continually refreshing our depleted spirits and souls – without that connection to the true vine of John 15, we sink into the deeps of chemistry and are harvested as the grapes of biological wrath ..
The Behaviourist Assumption – an objectivist, physical theory.
The story of soulless biochemically driven behaviour will be documented in and between groups and in and between individuals.
Direct cause and effect has been documented and deduced by these materialist sciences.
Such redundant societies, that can offer no life or beneficial transaction, can be perceived to follow the basic instincts of pain and pleasure derived from the biology of animal behaviour. These ideas were to be pursued in the 19th Century by researcher and philosopher Thomas Carlyle in his essays on Chartism. [Sartor Resartus, 1865]
Carlyle was perplexed by the insufficiency of moral and social explanation for ongoing disintegrative and nihilistic behaviour arising from previously facilitated individuals, usually of lower class.
The doctrine that embodied animal instincts of pain and pleasure and aversion as necessary social tools for the growth, communication and control of the un-intelligent arose first with Bentham, then became more refined by John Stuart Mill c.1843 CE in the doctrine of ‘Utilitarianism’.
The basic biochemical instincts of social life as driven by the endocrine system, the adrenal cortex and the gonadotropins, reduced human society to the level of Simian constructs in; e.g. aggression, co-operative groupings, grooming and play.
In terms, even of Adam Smith’s Enquiry into the Wealth of Nations , each social transaction will carry the most benefit to the individual at the least cost to the individual.
here we see the biochemical imperative as it drives and organises social groups in lower animals.
‘Members of bands of humans and social carnivores co-operate in hunting and protecting captured game and share, more or less amiably, the large quantities of food at kill. Co-operative interactions also play a role in the defense of the group against outside threats of various sorts. Importantly, co-operation extends only to members of one’s own tightly knit social unit; strangers are generally excluded, attacked, driven-off, or even killed.
Competitor carnivores of other species are treated hostilely as well. These attributes contribute to the defense of an economic base that will support a clan of large voracious predators. [Kruuk, H 1972, Mech, LD, 1970, Schaller GB 1972, in ‘Animal Behaviour – an evolutionary approach’ Alcock J pub. Sinauer Associates 1975 ISBN 0-87893-022-1].
Concludes Alcock .. ‘ Thus the special selection pressures associated with the niches of hunters have resulted in the evolution of behavioural similarities between unrelated animals (a primate and four carnivores) and substantial divergence between related species (humans and other primates, which are more purely herbivorous). ‘Cultural pressures can suppress or exaggerate sex-linked behaviour as well as act as a selective force on populations .. but the key point is .. ‘that the evolution of human reproductive and sexual behaviour owes a great deal to the unique ecological pressures operating on humans and rather little to our primate ancestry. The special factors associated with (human) hunting and gathering activity favoured stable pair bonding between mates. (for the facilitation of tool making intelligence in the young.) Reproduction is intimately linked with hunting behaviour and a division of labour between the sexes, as well as with the evolution of intelligence and increased brain size. All these factors have affected the nature of human courtship and copulation, which have been heavily modified (in humans) because they not only serve to produce offspring but contribute to pair formation and the prolonged child care suitable for the helpless big-brained progeny of a hunter-gatherer.’
Alcock’s behaviourism was essentially attempting to incorporate an additional gestation period into the human-animal lifecycle – a gestation period for intelligent capacity and species evolution through toolmaking.
Here is the very idea expounded on in human society.
Xenophon (c.428-c.354 BCE who was a ‘Greek’ soldier and man of letters, writes in his Memorabilia, while purporting to provide an account of the life and teachings of the philosopher Socrates, reflects an aristocratic ideal of relations between the sexes … ‘plainly we look for wives who will produce the best children for us, and marry them to raise a family. The husband supports the wife who is to share in the production of his family, and provides in advance whatever he thinks the expected children will find useful for life, on as generous a scale as possible. The wife conceives and bears her burden. She suffers pains and endangers her life; she gives away the food that sustains her. She goes through a period of labour, gives birth and brings up the child with care.
She has had no blessing in advance. The baby does not know its helper, and cannot convey its needs. She has to guess what is good for it and will satisfy it, and tries to provide these to the full. She cares for the baby night and day laboriously for a long period, with no expectation of reward.’
[Xenophon, Memorabilia 2.2.4-5]
In John Ferguson and Kitty Chisholm (eds) (1978) Political and Social Life in the Great Age of Athens, London, Open University p.147.
The step up from the simian research of Robert Ardrey, Anthony Storr and Konrad Lorenz suggested by Alcock is that as well as having a ‘Territorial Imperative’ fuelled by instinctual aggression and reproductive need, there is an imperative for the invention of tools that will address and solve any emergent environmental problem.
These tools or artefacts in [T] Psychology are both objects and information that are intended to solve or represent personal or social difficulty arising out of environmental and social problems. [Chant C and Goodman C, ‘Pre-industrial Cities and Technology’, 1999 pub. Routledge, Open University.] also, in Chant and Goodman, 1999, V. G Childe’s ‘Urban Revolution’ was powered by an increase in tools, social efficiency and organised and informed settlements.
Evolutionary Biology produced politicians and their tools of policy. The politician Demosthenes (384-322 BCE) was ‘the greatest Athenian orator’ of the ostentatious Sophist and elite schools of fourth century Athens. He suggested in pursuit of social efficiency .. ‘If an alien man cohabits with a female citizen in any way whatsoever, anyone who wishes and has the right shall indict him before the Thesmothetae. If he is convicted, he and his property shall be sold, and one third given to the successful prosecutor ..’
Roman Senators during the Republican era (510-27 BCE) had such scope of finance and personal power to both organise and undermine massive civic works such as the aqueducts. [Chant C, Goodman D, 1999, ‘Pre-industrial Cities and Technology’ ]
The regulation of social pain and pleasure is therefore an ancient pursuit on Earth.
Nevertheless such instincts to pain and pleasure were written into the history of psychology with recurring re-inforcement, as both intellectual and elite, first by Bentham and then by John Stuart Mill in the doctrine of Utilitarianism. [c.1900’s]
The need for a good imperative to social and collective tool making has to surpass the simplistic behaviourist model. There, in states of ‘levelling’ as described by Lewin, the Human Being has recourse to exploration, research and development. In times of biological ‘fortification’, surplus resources and the re-inforcements created by successful, personal, social and reproductive successful activity drive evolutionary activity in society.
Social Science at the level of big organisations can be described and represented by systems theories which can look and sound like models of basic organisms in biology.
Bertalanffy LV takes this activity away from the arbitrary by use of a general systems approach. In his general Systems Theory, p220, hew writes ‘in contrast to physical forces like gravity or electricity, the phenomena of life are found only in individual entities called organisms. Any organism is a system, that is, a dynamic order of parts and processes standing in mutual interaction (Bertalanffy, 1949a, p,11). Similarly, psychological phenomena are found only in individualized entities which in man are called personalities. ‘Whatever else personality may be, it has the property of a system’ (G. Allport, 19612, p. 109). ‘Even without ‘external stimuli’, the organism is not a passive but an intrinsically active system.
.. recent research shows with increasing clarity that autonomous activity of the nervous system, resting in the system itself, is to be considered primary. In evolution and development, reactive mechanisms appear to be super-imposed upon primitive, rhythmic-locomotor activities. The stimulus (i.e., a change in external conditions) does not cause a process in an otherwise inert system; it only modifies processes in an autonomously active system’ (Bertalanffy, 1937, pp.133ff.; also 1960).
The living organism maintains a disequilibrium called the steady state of an open system and thus is able to dispense existing potentials or ‘tensions’ in spontaneous activity or in response to releasing stimuli; it even advances towards higher order and organization.’
‘The robot (animal behaviourist) model, only partly covers animal behaviour and does not cover an essential portion of human behaviour at all. Autonomous activity is the most primitive form of behaviour (Von Bertalanffy, 1949a; Carmichael, 1954; Herrick, 1956; Von Holst, 1937; Schiller, 1957; H. Werner 1957a); it is found in brain function (Hebb, 1949) and in psychological processes. The discovery of activating systems in the brain stem (Berlyne, 1960; Hebb, 1955; Magoun, 1958) has emphasized this fact in recent years. Natural behaviour (for man) encompasses innumerable activities beyond the Stimulus and Response scheme, from exploring, play, and rituals in animals (Schiller, 1957) to economic, intellectual, aesthetic, religious, and the like pursuits to self-realization and creativity in man. Even rats seem to ‘look’ for problems (Hebb, 1955), and the healthy child and adult are going far beyond the reduction of tensions or gratification of needs in innumerable activities that cannot be reduced to primary or secondary drives (G. Allport, 1961, p90)
I depart from Bertalanffy there, as all behaviour and all transactions and intercourse arise in the world of the chemical and physical and operate to the physical dictates of some A to some B through some common C perhaps with an intercession of some modality D). This assertion by myself, does not preclude an animatic argument or a stance in Divinity that instantiates and then incorporates the Divine origins of consciousness.
These robot models of human life favour alien matrix modelling – but only if the human condition is bestialised and degraced.
My [T] stance is further substantiated by John Dewey’s ‘Instrumentalism’
‘If we want to find continuity in nature, we must regard every event from the point of view of the function it performs. Dewey maintains that we can classify events in terms of the degrees of complexity exhibited in their behaviour. …. Dewey argues that the emergence of living beings in the course of natural events does not imply a breach of continuity. It only means ‘that the physical things have acquired new properties, those of ability to produce a peculiar kind of interactive support of needs from surrounding media’. In his ‘Logic’ Dewey makes this idea of interaction central and traces the processes of reasoning to their existential socio-cultural bases. Thus he defines sensibility as ‘the capacity’ of living beings ‘to preserve’ their ‘pattern of behaviour’. He describes ‘feelings’ which human beings have, not as something superadded to a physical thing, ab extra, but as ‘a newly actualized quality acquired by events previously occurring on a physical level, when these events come into more extensive and delicate relationship of interaction.’ [Sathaye S G, ‘Instrumentalism – a methodological exposition of the philosophy of John Dewey’ pub. 1972, Popular Prakashan, Bombay.]
Jewey, 1929, in the absence of massive computation would have found it difficult to empirically research the ‘increasingly complex and intimate interactions amongst natural events’ e.g. Chaos Theory of [Mandelbrot B , 1975, Fractals, IBM]
The basic underlying laws of [T] Relativity provide a formal framework to assert the ‘a priori’ status of continuity upon the physical theory and its biological and behavioural implications.
In humans and simians, the biochemical activity resulting from a combination of diet, good mating and genes is responsible for the behavioural impetus in; survival, adaptation and in the operation of dominance hierarchy. The best served adrenal glands and endocrine system produce the best aggressive behaviour, and in man, ultimately the best cognitive strategy for tool making and problem solving in e.g. defence of food stocks or the herd.
Given alien farming methods can drive humanity down to bestial sexual levels, then Behaviourism and its biochemical descriptions is sufficient to explain the need for social and species information transfers at all levels of systemic organisation and environmental interactions in biology.
The biological robot is of course an unenlightened tragedy as millennia of passionate disputes on this Earth bear witness to.
The best served adrenal glands producing the best aggressive behaviour and territorial displays drive the hierarchy from the top down, creating; alpha, beta and gamma (recessive) attributes in individuals.
The larger anthropoid ‘energy packets’ donate structural integrity to the colony by driving the biochemical sustenance-intake strategies of the herd down a psychological transference gradient maintained by the gradation of the relatively biochemically strong down to the relatively biochemically weak.
This induces relatively great degrees of recognition of innate biological necessities within the group.
The law-like activity of ‘relatively efficient biochemical packets’ has been noted and described by Lewin  as applicable to Human psychology and behaviour.
In humanity, the psychological precepts of self-recognition by ‘cognitive impact’ as noted by Lewin and Karsten although applicable, do not convey the true effects of the central priority within the human version of this transaction and the velocity as it can be felt at its most socially extreme and ‘unsocial.’
i.e. the velocity of the dominant versus the recessive identity or challenger.
In humanity, full of complex information processes, and behavioural descriptions, one can often tell if some transactions are usual and if perhaps we have been very, very unlucky. This may incur a great sense of intelligent ‘shame’ or social redundancy if left arbitrarily unaddressed.
In the song called ‘the Boxer’ by Simon and Garfunkel, nowhere in the 20th Century has the feeling of social redundancy been better expressed, as the incessant brutality and velocity of the incongruent and the dominant, strikes a chord with the repressed and vulnerable. A young man in the ‘company of strangers’ running scared and running away from home as a youth, seeks out shelter from the dangerous heights of social violence amongst the ‘poorer quarters where the ragged people go’. Finding that the New York city winters were bleeding him and that he was living a lie by assuming that his being was relevant to society, he eventually comes to terms with his identity. That he is separate by traumatic disassociation from society and he has nowhere to go.’
[Simon and Garfunkel’s Greatest Hits, CBS, 1973. catalog. 69003]
According to Karsten in ‘Psychische Sattigung, Psychol. Forsch. 1928(10) 142-154, ‘the velocity with which an activity is satiated increases with the degree to which the activity is psychologically central (as against peripheral). Lewin states ‘This proposition has the nature of a general law, e.g. a law should be accepted as valid only if it is not contradicted by data in any branch of psychology – in this sense, a law should always be general.
The combination of a number of forces acting at the same point at a given time is called the resultant force and drives the relationship between force of world and behaviour of self.
Here it is noted that the power law of high to low across a common medium is in force not only in chemicals and electricity and physics, but in human and probably alien psychology.
Whenever a force different from zero exists, there is either a ‘locomotion’ in the direction of that resultant force or a change in cognitive structure equivalent to this locomotion. The reverse holds: whenever a ‘locomotion’ proceeds or change of structure results, the resultant forces are measured to exist in that direction.
Wolfgang Köhler in addition to Lewin’s biological behaviourism added that beings did not exist independently of electromagnetic lines of force and were part of the same physical field that could allegedly be observed as spatial orientations within physically observable empirical biology.
Perceptions humanity have of time and matter are only partial and ‘temporarily’ flawed. e.g. Energy, matter, time, the cycles of the moon, the tides, the seasons as they manifest within diurnal rhythms of trees, plants and crop growth etc. tie our moods by association of past life events into chains of e.g. seasonal colour and light intensity to aid, or forget, the recall of past activities etc. Our biology comprised of 90% water, is immersed in the contextual electromagnetic spectrum of the world of biological water in the biomass, hydrosphere and oceans. This biomass is under the gravitational influence of the moon. Lyall Watson in his book called ‘Supernature’ pub. 1974, Coronet, ISBN 0-340-18834-0, documents overwhelming empirical evidence that establishes tidal trends and electromagnetism and the cycle of the moon as driving factors in animal behaviour. Analogies of resonance and ‘feeling like such and such’, empathy and empathising, and ‘striking a chord’ and ‘ringing a bell’ run through the associations of the human mind.
In Neuro Linguistic Programming, NLP, the analytic psychological strategy for personal classification is based upon the individuals associations and sensory orientation. e.g. ‘I hear that ..’, ‘I see that ..’ etc
e.g. A sympathetic conversation leading to the supply of advice about personal choice of consumer products or cultural opinions elicits a transference of social energies in the form of advice to the other party. This relativity continuously in the form of the tools and artefacts and objects of information impelled by ergonomic and biological expenditure. Such biological expression must also be carried upon a bioelectric or biomagnetic carrier wave to the other individual simultaneously with the sound.
As you relate to an individual and are directing vocal and physical energy in various modes of biological expression whilst resonating or empathising with their mindset there will also be a resonant connection between the external query and the internalisation of the associative and biological response.
The external query having been mutually acceptable for the purposes of discourse then elicited a flow of information from the individual driven by (his) temporal and biological associations. This data flows as a resultant locomotive force from the individual, who is also a physical electromagnetic source of high innervation and biological activity. This nervous, biological and electrical energy flows down the gradient via the conduit of the facilitative associations the target querant put in place with the query structure that the target had empathised with.
This InterPersonal connection or IP connection, or ‘relational (social) gradient of mutually acceptable energy association and flow between two energy beings across and down a common time space medium and energy gradient.’ [e.g. Köhler, and, Kurt Lewin’s ‘Field Theory in Psychology’, [Tavistock Institute, 1952]] in truth probably does have a real numerical value in Standard Industrial Units in the electromagnetic spectrum ad deduced by Köhler.
Factors such as; the relative lack of personal and psychological symmetry with the individual and relative lack of empathy with their social style of address would introduce impedance into the flow of information. Driven by the energies of either short or long term biological association within the subject a data transaction would flow down the relationship gradient to the needy recipient or querant.
A [T] modification of Lewin’s Behaviourist Model.
In suggesting or implying that Field Independent Beings are always shallow, irrational and impersonal with behaviour driven from the activities of the natural sexual selection within chemical processes, there is need for caution.
The behaviourist and biochemical assumption that hierarchy is driven by aggression is evident as a normative standard in psychology, but it leaves two possibilities with which to evaluate the Field Independence.
(i) The Individual is anti-social
(ii) The individual is asocial.
i.e. either antagonistic or some degree of neutral.
The possibilities within sensory and environmental chaos for the emergence of complex behaviour and the perception of great intelligence and sophisticated ‘a priori’ knowledge amongst the perceived adaptations was a problem that confounded neuroscience research according to Edelman.
‘Another set of observations brings us to psychological dilemmas of the most profound kind. They cast doubt on the idea that the complex behaviour of animals with complex brains can be explained solely by ‘learning’. Indeed this crisis highlights the fundamental problem of neuroscience. How can an animal initially confront a small number of ‘events’ or ‘objects’ and after this exposure adaptively categorize or recognize an indefinite number of novel objects. (even in a variety of contexts) as being similar or identical to the small set that it first encountered?
How can an animal, in the absence of a teacher, recognize an object at all? How can it then generalize and ‘construct’ a ‘universal’ in the absence of that object or even in its presence? This kind of generalization occurs without language in animals such as pigeons.’
[Edelman G, ‘Bright Air, Brilliant Fire – on the matter of the mind’ pub. 1994, Penguin, ISBN 0-1401-7244-0, p.28.]
Edelman using computer modelling of the physical chemistry of brain behaviour had discovered that there was an automatic intelligence within biological constructs, that when applied to an object interacting by some process with the intelligent needs of the organism produced an adaptive or facilitative response.
In [T], this ‘automatic intelligence’ has a rational model.
The question of whether education in; pain, pleasure or aversion produces civilisation, [Mill JS] is addressed in this work [T], however, for neuroscience it is still a 20th Century dilemma.
Perhaps the human sophistry of our intelligence begot more ontologically creative pleasures within profit margins and static fixture investments driven, supplied and defended by other successful tool-making ventures.
The results of human intelligence, however, according to Edelman were driven from a psychology emergent from the behaviour of the physical and chemical context of our environment.
[Edelman 1994, p.160.] ‘First of all, we need not reach beyond biology itself to mount any exotic explanations of the mind. No new principles need to be adduced to account for consciousness – only new evolutionary morphologies. Second, these notions, if correct, rule out a general description of the brain as a Turing machine or (arbitrary) computer.
‘That consciousness arose in the material order does not restrain intellectual trade; philosophy itself is witness to this conclusion. But it does limit us, despite our capacity to extend our senses and our powers of calculation through physical devices.’
Edelman’s position is that of ‘qualified realism’ – with recourse to natural, physical and chemical activity.
‘Our description of the world is qualified by the way in which our concepts arise. And although there may be infinite freedom (within) a grammar, our language and our ideas of meaning go far beyond the rules of grammar’. ‘By taking the position of biologically based epistemology, we are in some sense realists and also sophisticated materialists.’ ‘Mind, which arose from material systems and yet can serve goals and purposes, is nevertheless a product of historical processes ..’ [Edelman, 1994, p.161.]
Edelman’s apparently self-contradictory conclusion that the mind looks like an arbitrary Turing machine, but is not, is not in fact a contradiction in terms of his own ‘qualified realism’. This because all physical, chemical, biological and psychological transactions occur in the context of a perception of a transaction from Some A to Some B through some common C (with the possibility of influence also from some common modality D that would add in any transitory and undecidable temporal state.)
The object of our attention, that we interrogate with our senses at time1 is a noun, A, and its moments of change entail physical; creation, recreation, and therefore does physical and observable work upon its environment that we label as ‘verb C’ (doing). i.e. Object to do C.
The effect of this work C in our common context has qualitative attributes that we then label after the fact of time1. Antecedent to time1 is the working process C done by the changing object A at time2. It is a qualitative value judgement relevant to our observations and life processes as Adjective B, where the adjective is the process of transaction and interaction currently in focus for this consciousness.
This precept follows the basic rules of physical chemistry and biology and electricity i.e. Fajan’s Rules, osmosis and Ohm’s Law etc.
In context under observation as a [T] process language is:
MACRO is NOUN
MESO is VERB
MICRO is ADJECTIVE
Here, the perceptible interaction of the object of our focus within the setting of our focus is attributing some value to our consciousness such that the acquisition of qualitative appreciation or degradation induces personal growth.
This pain, pleasure, aversion or contradiction between the observer and the object is mediated greatly or little at all by the amount of transitional stages involved in the transference down the gradient from the High-energy system to the Low energy system.
In those terms, natural language arises from and is driven by entirely physical processes.
These physical processes readily translate into [T] consciousness and natural language as macro/object/noun, meso/process/verb, micro/quality/adjective. Language and consciousness as we know it therefore is chemically and ontologically derivable in terms of observational focus and learned associations.
It is this focus that becomes the field strength defined by Lewin in terms of levelling and sharpening.
Lewin’s idealistic social model of transactions in field theory cannot be sustained directly by the animal behaviour model alone.
Although the animal behaviour model is hormonally driven through; pain, pleasure, stamina and territory the human model must acquire another layer of analogy to account for; intellect, artefacts and information.
I choose the analogy of an invisible foliage of information within the human jungle. This was already suggested by Köhler’s objectivist stance on the electromagnetic properties of physical biomass and chemistry, similar to Lewin’s ideas. In Wolfgang Köhler’s own stance on EM field theory, the psychological process was caused by and dependent on and driven by an electromagnetic field.
You can see from the quotes that the most basic ingredients give shape to the most basic human imperatives without Spirit, Christ or soul.
Both Lewin and Köhler’s who were contemporaries had theories that arose out of the Gestalt school.
Language itself is directly rooted in the observations of objects and their physical transactions with the physical context.
These transactions, in intelligent societies have a history of qualitative judgements, social significance and historical values as tools of; pain, pleasure, aversion or contradiction as conscious attributes attached to their physical behaviour and, or manufacture.
‘Linguistic Feeding Behaviour’ [LFB], incorporates; physiologically driven mastery responses, nurture, nesting and boundary closure of information systems, and, the introduction and closure of contradictions. The basic physics of objectivism, can therefore fully explain by analogy with self-regulating transaction models e.g. Kauffman S and Langton C in Levy S and also Goodwin B in [Lewin R, ‘Complexity, life at the edge of chaos’, pub. 1993, Dent, London. ISBN 0-460-86092-5] the emergence of new personal, organic, systemic and social focus in response to arbitrary environmental intrusion and contradiction.
The unusually turbulent challenge to self and society presented by new personal and social and environmental introductions and contradictions, releases more historically solitary information aggregates into the chaotic but eventually self-regulating mixture of information.
Isolated (in terms of analogy with Lewin’s ‘Field Theory’) as ‘sharpening’, these previously less valuable and unusual aggregates now enter into the re-establishment of equilibrium within the turbulent information, synthesising new attributes that embody, facilitate and encode the perceived changes.
New challenges to; self, social and environmental information arise from the natural order of chaos at various scales of magnitude both internal and external to the immediate context of the self.
These external challenges that include new levels of magnitude and complexity of; pain, pleasure, aversion or contradiction, drive the energy and interactivity levels of the existing complexes to produce greater levels of unity and interactive equivalence.
In terms of Lewin , interactive equivalence is truly ‘social levelling.’
[LFB] Linguistic Feeding Behaviour by the individual can be augmented or hindered by previous social information production and artefact deposition. This creates a topographical bias and steep social gradient created by the activities and results of historical priorities. A society, consisting of the systematic interaction of social; aggregates, simples and complexes emerges in a telic way a more organised and steady state given the consistency of its context with time.
In autocatalytic systems it was found by e.g. Kauffman that data self-organised such that it would most efficiently streamline and regulate its internal physics. Kauffman found that the process of molecular intercommunication gradually eroded the number of unfit or ‘sharp’ [Lewin 1952] transactions, and increased the number of ‘level’ [Lewin 1952] or homeostatic interactions.
The laws of physics as pertaining to biology, e.g. the second law of thermodynamics, however, were found by [Langton C, c.1992 CE in Levy S, p.108]] to be wanting as they was not fully able to explain why in biology both emergence and entropy work together to produce construction, destruction and regrowth. Other areas of science e.g. cosmology’s ‘Big Bang Theory’, ‘Schiffler’s Horns’, were at a loss to move on and falsify their bad models which were so-often re-adjusted as to make them unrecoverable [Popper K, 1963, ‘Conjectures and Refutations’] as rational conjectures that predicted rational falsifiable results. e.g. ‘Big Bang Theory.’
The answer was, however that Langton and the Chaos School were right and, the Linear Reductionists that were also supplying the 20th Century, scientific paradigm with allegations of meaning, were wrong.
Investigations into co-operative self-organising constructs using
Darwinistic principles enabled sophisticated artificial-life worlds to
become published at the Santa Fe Institute.
[e.g. social modelling that ‘extends from the origins of human cultural behaviour to state-level societies … this approach to the evolution of culture may focus on the study of the emergence of collective behaviour from independent agents whose actions are based on evolving individual schemata, leading to the evolution of social structures.’ [Murray Gel-Mann’s prehistoric culture project.]
Models of Complexity in the ‘natural’ universe were starting to pay dividends at the Santa Fe Institute, New Mexico as early as 1991. e.g’s..
1. Modelling of Biological Adaptation with the ECHO model, [Forrest and Jones, Santa Fe Institute] modelling biological and interspecies adaptation.
2. The Swarm Model, Langton, [SFI]. Swarm is designed for capturing the interactions among a large number of independent agents. The environment is in part determined by the agents, and therefore is modified as a result of their interactions. Swarm is being designed for modelling applications as diverse as ecology, economics, and the evolution of human cultural behaviour.
3. Epstein and Axtell [Brookings Institution] have developed Artificial Social Life (ASL). ‘we have also grown entire little proto-histories of society, in which cultural groups – reds and blues – emerge from a primordial ‘soup’, and migrate to separate sugar peaks. The basic ecological principle of carrying capacity – that a given resource base cannot support an indefinite number of agents – is immediately evident.
more soulless robot models of society that are accurate, predictable and influencable by the fact that the aggressive hormones of animalised psychology create basic and known individual and social outputs.
When the populations grow, they force a diffusion back down into the lowland between the sugar mountains, where combat, and cultural assimilation (modelled as tag flipping) perpetually unfold.’
‘If seasons are introduced, migrators and hibernators emerge.’ [SFI Bulletin, Fall. 1993 vol8, no.2]
An anthropomorphic ‘linguistic intake model’ for man based on the bio-morphology of physical feeding attributes and behaviour, represents the acquisition of data in man at the level of sophistication that Wolfgang Köhler foresaw in the innate bio-magnetism of man’s life and environment.
Beyond Köhler’s model however, the ‘linguistic intake model’ is driven by the necessary biological and continuous observation of and response to, physical change within self and environment.
This is perceived by the individual as changes in linguistic representations of the object transactions within society and the environment.
In terms of the Köhler analogy, the individual is interacting with an invisible meta-layer of intellectual ‘biomass’.
In man, ‘jaw’ is indicative of social elocution and efficiency, where the male may consume by dictate any social obstacle to release its energy using a process and feeding behaviour called ‘language’.
If you can imagine an alien scanning human bodies and looking for the most basic signals and base level subconscious mechanics …
The human male, its jaw, and the phenotypic structural and ergonomic efficiency of this male attribute (usually indicative of strength to greater or lesser degrees – the more square the more rigid etc) creates a square or cubical effect in the male.
[Squareness being indicative of the robust and integrity]
In this basic sexual stereotyping;
In the female, the reverse is true, where inefficiency and non-contradiction are required, the most able nesting partner tends to have a morphologically slimmer and rounded head or triangular jaw so as not to provoke acts of attention and linguistic feeding from any social process.
The implied phenotypic efficiency in either sex may diminish with age and with biological integrity (i.e. decrepitude.).
INTEGRITY OF BIOLOGY, PSYCHOLOGY AND INTELLECT.
With the physical approach to person-centered modelling that took the view: (person (P) – damage (D) at time1 .. time2) the systematic and bio-physical approach to behaviour came with a social penalty.
Bertalanffy responds to the inane social implications within this model of the biological robot.
In ‘General System Theory in Psychology and Psychiatry’, p.218-219, he quotes (Murray, 1962, pp. 36-54,) stating the case for the robot model.
‘Man is a computer, an animal, or an infant. His destiny is completely determined by genes, instincts, accidents, early conditionings and re-inforcements, cultural and social forces. Love is a secondary drive based on hunger and oral sensations or a reaction formation to an innate underlying hate. In the majority of our personological formulations there are no provisions for creativity, no admitted margins of freedom for voluntary decisions, no fitting recognitions of the power of ideals, no bases for selfless actions, no ground at all for any hope that the human race can save itself from the fatality that now confronts it.’
Bertalanffy p.218 criticises the idiom .. ‘the tenets of robot psychology, … the concept of man as a robot was both an expression of and a powerful motive force in industrialised mass society. It was the basis for behavioural engineering in commercial, economic, political and other advertising and propaganda; the expanding economy of the ‘affluent society’ could not subsist without such manipulation. Only by manipulating humans ever more into Skinnerian rats, robots, buying automata, homeostatically adjusted conformers and opportunists (or, bluntly speaking, into morons and zombies) can this great society follow its progress toward ever increasing gross national product.’
Bertalanffy then illustrates the human problems that arise out of an affluent society experiencing satiety. … ‘Precisely under the conditions of reduction of tensions and gratification of biological needs, novel forms of mental disorder appeared as existential neurosis, malignant boredom, and retirement neurosis (Alexander, 1960), i.e. forms of mental dysfunction originating not from repressed drives, from unfulfilled needs, or from stress but from the meaninglessness of life.’. Bertalanffy required a more flexible model for the human psyche than the rigidity of the robotic model, believing that an ‘active personality system’ was ‘a more adequate conceptual framework for normal and pathological psychology.’
Ludwig von Bertalanffy, pub. 1971, Penguin, ‘General System Theory’.
Bertalanffy in 1971, in his bibliography indicates a massive body of social and scientific research dedicated to general system theories.
It was not until the advent of massive computation two decades later at the Santa Fe Institute c.1990, that true perspectives into ‘vertical scales’ of computational modelling and complexity were to be illustrated.
Later developments in massive computational modelling of self-regulating neural nets simply re-inforced the behaviourist approach to roboticism, developing a homeostatic and flexible system that was never-the-less programmable and robotic.
Such systems were never autocratic, as they were domain and often task specific because they operated with reference to the world of their immediate context, its labels and the arbitrary.
e.g. [from: Coveney P and Highfield R, ‘Frontiers of Complexity – the search for order in a chaotic world’, pub. 1995, Faber and Faber, ISBN 0-571-16991-0]. ‘Kohonen’s self-organising neural network differs from the multilayer perceptron and Hopfield nets because it is a single layered, two-dimensional collection of neurons; each input neuron is completely connected to the neurons in this layer. When taught a task, such as converting speech into text, it automatically generates a feature map within the network. (p.307-309). ‘… The kind of localisation of function seen in real brains emerges naturally in this model.’.
‘Grossberg S and Carpenter G developed adaptive resonance theory (ART), (p.141 refers) .. using the Kohonen nets. They are called adaptive nets because they are based on certain biological models of behaviour and cognition. ‘ … a small oscillation of the same frequency as the natural vibrations of a mechanical or electrical system can set the system oscillating with a large amplitude – with shattering results, as when an opera singer hits the resonant frequency of a glass. Similarly, information that propagates through an ART network oscillates between the neural layers; during this resonant period, adaptive learning occurs.’
Bertalanffy though had demonstrated the flaws and ills in the reductionist scientific paradigm that would serve to constrict and restrain organic vision into the insensitive domains of tool-enhanced reality where other metaphysical realities may encroach through disassociation from the organic in a mechanistic explanation of reality. ( The process of de-anthropomorphization -Von Bertalanffy, 1937, 1953b).
‘Physics necessarily starts with the sensory experience of the eye, the ear, the thermal sense, etc., and thus builds up fields like optics, acoustics, theory of heat, which correspond to the realms of sensory experience. Soon, however, these fields fuse into such that do not have any more relation to the ‘visualizable’ or ‘intuitable’: optics and electricity fuse into electromagnetic theory, mechanics and theory of heat into statistical thermodynamics, etc. This evolution is connected with the invention of artificial sense-organs and the replacement of the human observer by the recording instrument. Physics, though starting with everyday experience, soon transgresses it by expanding the universe of experience through artificial sense organs. Thus, for example, instead of seeing only visible light with a wave length between 380 and 760 millimicra, the whole range of electromagnetic radiation, from shortest gamma rays up to radio waves of some kilometres in length, is disclosed. .. with a mechanistic view, we .. enter another metaphysical realm.’
[Bertalanffy, GST, 1971, p.255.]
For Humanity, enduring stress and suffering aids the process of social cohesion in promoting; unity, self awareness, social symmetry and sensitivity (e.g. do unto others as you would have them do unto you), and ecumenical tolerance.
The machine however, operating at greater scales and levels of physical tolerance within e.g. a biological environment, has no such problems with the psychology of systemic stress i.e. pain and aversion.
To a certain extent, there may be ‘social co-operation’ within equivalent physical systems (species) at all levels of a physical magnitude, but not between all levels of magnitude. (predation)
THE NATURE OF CONSCIOUSNESS
Human Souls, from wherever or whatever perfect Universe they come from and relate to come to this Universe and form large soul clusters. In our case, the physical impact of our synthesis produces; desirable and persistent objects and artefacts and information.
They may not always choose to co-operate with their inherited biology though.
In the material Universe, souls are performing the distillation of information processing systems into a cognitive core capable of autocratic self-regulation. e.g. [Roman Law, Justinian c.500 CE]
The intellectual chemistry of soul affiliations and memory retention of previous social interactions, makes possible the evolution of structure, nurture or destruction much in the same way that compatible or incompatible chemicals have the potential for interaction.
If souls are the chemistry, then it is God that is the first cause of our grateful Architecture and of our gardens and ‘many mansions’ of abundant Aether.
Groups of soul molecules are thus being formed or are forming into artefacts by another perspective. We cannot see it, but teleology gives us a model.
Individual souls may thus mediate between polar opposites and by acquired and innate skills, to utilise the results of the many transactions, and much in the same way that a planet. e.g. Earth, has a specific and biased periodic table. The chemistry of group souls is such that many transactions and ideological artefacts would not be Universally congruent.
Souls may form and operate; monotonic, dualistic, simplex or complex associations and relationships.
The organic/biological idioms have their own ‘ideas’ that produce classes of artefact. These progress into more specialised tools.
An organism or artefact results from a slowed and differentiated and considered discharge and direction of energy between two systems. E.g. self and the world, or self and self.
The effectiveness of energy release of the object’s structure and mechanics contributes efficiency to the end result.. Intellectual feeding contributes to the greater self-regulating umbrella of the whole in Man’s Society.
The colours and linguistics and form of such records, record qualitative states of excitement and values that can be attributed to each of the processes commonly viewed and agreed within the group.
Certain social objects may be imbued with representative attributes and issues, and imbued with either; historic, contemporary or projected issues within the group.
These may for example be represented with stable morphology, unstable morphology, positive colouring or negative colouring that may or may not reflect group issues and policies.
In soul group emergence where new souls intercede from elsewhere, their conformity to social resting norms within degrees of transference between and amongst the social aggregates can be measured by the velocity of the transference gradient.
This level or sharp transfer of personal issues may be embodied as distortions in socially created artefacts.
If the innate scaling differences in these beings brought with them from operating previously different forms and social constructs are too high in relation to the agreed social norm, they will cause social distortion.
Linguistic and cultural distortion in; artefacts, beings, and social behaviour may be detectable as depictions of; process breakage or overload or overstatement amongst the cultural, social, or peer group norms, that have been previously agreed.
If the social structures set up by society to facilitate this new shift in attitude are adhered to, and the output of this new body of contradictory soul assets are amenable and agreeable to society such that the perceived distortion in the original cultural assets are removed, then this new incumbent, or set of, is an asset to this social group of souls and their ‘a priori’ agreements.
An evaluation of a combination of the deviants; social, physical and intellectual tools combined with their social product as material objects would determine the performance and value of a being to society and its agreements.
Questions arise as to whether the output is; context orientated, appreciative, respectful, etc, however at a chemical level of analogy, these ‘qualities’ are relative judgements. The deviants’ facilitative contributions of input (chemically speaking) are perceived in objectivism as ‘transitional elements and materials’ created and relative to the ‘a priori’ ontological modelling of our social organism. The ‘a priori’ social organism and equilibrium is comprised of artificial self-regulating agreements between existing elements of being.
Souls preferring different ratios of high to low [sharpening/levelling and transference] whose life experience originates in new and different cosmic aggregates and intrusions and inclusions will interact with the previously established social equilibrium.
These interactions will have higher than normative transference velocities creating new fusions within existing materials or new products and fusions from within existing materials.
Senses and perceptions and their effects good and bad on the nature of being have been discussed and returned to for millennia in the great traditions of humanity.
The modern case for objectivist perception is still being re-iterated today in the era of massive computation, but had clarity in the 18th Century.
Isaac Newton in Opticks, 1704, ‘ … The … light and rays which appear red, or, rather, make objects appear so I call rubrific or red-making; those which make objects appear yellow, green, blue, and violet, I call yellow-making, green-making, violet-making, and so of the rest. And, if at any time I speak of light and rays as coloured or endued with colours, I would be understood to speak not philosophically and properly, but grossly, and according to such conceptions as … people in seeing all these experiments would be apt to frame. For the rays, to speak properly, are not coloured. In them there is nothing else than a certain power and disposition to stir up a sensation of this or that colour. For as sound in a bell, or musical string, or other sounding body, is nothing but a trembling motion, and in the air nothing but that motion propagated from the object, and in the sensorium it is a sense of that motion under the form of sound; so colours in the object are nothing but a disposition to reflect this or that sort of rays more copiously than the rest. In the rays they are nothing but their dispositions to propagate this or that motion into the sensorium, and in the sensorium they are the sensations of those motions under the form of colours.’
[Newton I, ‘Opticks’: 1704, in Flew A, p.89, ‘An Introduction to Western Philosophy’, rev. pub. 1989, Thames and Hudson, ISBN 0-500-27547-5]
The requirement to identify an object in flux with which to reflect on as a noun has been stated by Plotinus c.600 BCE and Descartes in rule 11 of ‘rules for the direction of mind’. From the former: ‘By reflecting on the mutual dependence of two propositions, we acquire the habit of distinguishing at a glance what is more or less relative, and what the steps are by which a relative fact is related to something absolute.’
Having defined a basic ‘natural’ transaction model in [A] as; some A to some B through some common C, with the intercession of some D, we are faced with the values of the sense receptors, our material capacities etc to record or retain or peruse the materials and qualities that have interested us.
Descartes in rule 12 of ‘rules for the direction of the mind’ with additional editorial by Hennessey 2004, : – ‘we ought to employ all the aids of understanding, imagination, sense and memory, first for the purpose of having a distinct intuition of simple propositions; partly also in order to compare the (qualitative assessment of) propositions (e.g. transaction observed at time1) to be proved with those we know already (from artefacts and information stored), so that we may be able to recognise their truth; partly also in order to discover the truths, (of the relativity and use of this interesting process), which should be compared with each other so that nothing may be left lacking on which human industry may exercise itself.’
Descartes, however, didn’t schedule the interruptions of natural chaos into his system of rules. The finalism, however, was there.
Rule 5, ‘method consists entirely in the order and disposition of the objects towards which our mental vision must be directed if we would find out any truth. We shall (attempt to) comply with it exactly if we reduce involved and obscure propositions step by step to those that are simpler, and then starting with the intuitive apprehension of all those that are absolutely simple, attempt to ascend to the knowledge of all others by precisely similar steps.’
As such human social systems based within complex biology assemble through the production of regulatory synthesis and structure, the tools of emergent behavioural activity, the intellectual output require a common medium of constructs – an operating system of language upon which to base mutual reaction and interaction and facilitation.
The processes and motions and transactions observed within the commonality and equivalence of a scale of energy-complexity by an organisation can be recorded as objects, artefacts and information.
The more sophisticated the investment in social growth, facilitation and regulatory evolution, the more ‘objects and information’ that would be produced in proportion.
[e.g. also Descartes; rule15, rule16.]
Social interaction, then, can be measured in terms of an objectivist and empirical approach to both individual production and individual production in relation to the social necessity.
If the output is to be adjudged healthy, then it must only be sufficient that it appeals to a broader than local, or, regional category of output that is normative. The output would use the attributes of local materials, their transference velocities and complexities and previous transference records to represent a new ordering of knowledge.
The psychological expectations, abilities and realities of the species operating within their social remit can be classified and evaluated using anthropomorphic constructs.
The male and female form are aspects of a microcosm that reflect in their outward garb and appearance both personal and social viability.
The Male and Female psychological states, driven by the endocrine system and its sexual hormones also produce some physiological transitional states of relative; gender activity, roles and reproductive and peer group success.
My personal view is that the soul exists but its loving empowerment does not drive social and personal life but is dragged into sensate transactions that are ultimately selfish and self-demeaning.
This section of the work truly refers to people in a state of being that is dependent on the world of matter for their cues. These people as current psychiatry would suggest are driven by biological and biochemical necessity.
I believe, however, unlike current science, that for most there are varying degrees of influence of both soul and biology.
This section deals with the influences of biological determinism without reference to soul. A soul-less and un-loving stance some may say, but here defined is a relative bottom line from which we know that we can choose to deviate. In so deviating we can more easily identify the works of the human soul and its need for God.
Humanity tends to wear its psychological state upon its form in the manner of clothing and also in its selection of social and personal umbrella.
It can be seen to be searching out symmetry and opposites within its sexual and intellectual social groupings, and has a very high drop out for social failures in the technological and high population parts of the planet that are the most competitive.
The anthropoid species operates in terms of the execution of directives in response to; environment, nutrition levels, competition and availability of mating.
In terms of an anthropomorphic ‘meaning map’ of its own perceived biological identity and capacity, even reduced to descriptors of the most basic chemical levels of performance and in terms of its perceived social and environmental process, – the ‘legs’ are the carrier vehicle for its identity and its ‘feet’ as the obstacle engagement process in the act of its transit.
The sexually differentiated area of either gender are the keys to successful social process, therefore, at a biological level the psychology of efficient access for each potential target can be deduced from the psychological keys in the colour and morphology of the choice of clothing.
The human waist, of either sex, if slim, promises social efficiency.
The upper body, chest and ‘shoulders’ indicative of the strength of and or capacity of the social role of the biological being.
The human social interphase, appendages or ‘arms’ enable it to operate within its social context, and its digits ‘fingers’ may or may not deliver high precision efficiency at any social process according to levels of social entrainment and expectation.
The lower head – or ‘jaw’ is indicative of social elocution and efficiency, where the male may consume by dictate any social obstacle to release its energy using a process and feeding behaviour called ‘language’.
High efficiency of this process usually creates a square or cubical effect in the jaw of the male, and in the female, the reverse is true, where inefficiency and non-contradiction are required for efficient coupling. In the female or submissive social morphology or gender type, the most able nesting partner has a rounded or triangular jaw so as not to provoke acts of attention and linguistic feeding from any social process.
The presence or absence of Human hair on the head of either male or female may signify strength or weakness or ability in any given context where hair can represent well tended social and nutritional abundance in some situations or an encumbrance in others that are more competitive.
It has been found that choice of colour does indicate either depression or excitation, [Lüscher, M] and that the relative tightness and constriction of any clothing and wrapping may allude to psychological tensions within social situations and peer group competition.
Tight leggings in the male may emphasise phenotypic and psychological mobility and strength, or in a weaker male physique and personae, insecurity and social dysfunction.
In a female personae, tight wrapping and restrictions suggest encumbrance that could be interpreted in terms of; biological viability, peer group and psychological inviability, social viability or social inviability depending on the available liberty within financial and class structures.
Loose clothing suggestive of unencumbered life styles, may also point to inefficiency within the individuals social education when used inappropriately e.g. an individual wearing long heavy sleeves operating a technological factory unit.
Female psychology may be read in terms of its accessibility to a process of breeding and social mobility as demonstrated by clothing styles and other nest-building acquisitions and aspirations derived during its youthful socialisation period.
20th Century female fashion sometimes tended to portray the female as vulnerable. Intentions and marketing within footwear tended to raise female executive intentions to inefficient heights off the ground using raised ‘heels’ under the feet.
In terms of social industry however, the executive intentions indicative of pheromonic oestrus and the signalling of intention to breed for the good of the nest could be used in other more complex social strategies that facilitated non-reproductive evolution.
In having a lower centre of gravity and greater stability, and
perhaps less decorative and more durable displays
therefore, Male footwear tends to facilitate more immediate
commitments to both personal rigour and change.
Human infrastructure can be classified by caste system, as can the infrastructure vehicles of; factory, home and car. [one or zero]
1. luxury [fruition deployed] [fruition undeployed]
2. ordinary [nesting deployed] [nesting undeployed]
3. industrial [high packet energy] [low packet energy]
This will aid the classification of the target by incorporating a psychological profile of his/her social potential and expectations, both by colour, [social attitude; where high frequency colours represent positive and low frequency colours represent negative [Lüscher, M]]. Streamlining efficiency: – the degree of streamlining such that growth and material projection can be efficiently marshalled and extended within efficient levels of tolerance of environmental change within; factory, home and car – gives a good indicator of projected social aspirations within these contexts.
To represent facility and its capacity to progress and perform evolutionary movement in any necessary direction as having no streamlining, or no tolerance for environmental change indicates a very negative approach to growth and efficiency in an entropy ridden Universe.
The structures of; factory, home and car may also have a low or high centre of gravity, conveying relative degrees of capacity to perform actual; practical or impractical social applications.
The amount of available space within; factory, home or car is indicative of the life’s capacity for adaptation and the power of its financial turnover and financial engine will reflect on its capacity for crisis management and management of any crisis to its integrity.
In times of social stress and disintegrity, distortion may become visibly incorporated into both local and regional lifestyles during identifiable patterns of industrial change.
Distortions may be visibly emerged within the artefacts, tools and information processes of; lifestyle i.e. patterns of eating and dressing, working and the viability of artefact manufacture.
Distortion also may enter into agreements within cultural and recreational activities, relationships between parents and children and also generally impact on personal and peer group life-chances. E.g. patterns of infant mortality, physical and mental illness, childlessness, marital conflict, separation and divorce and in general, the opportunity for well being that would make them socially sustainable and viable appear fatalistic.
Industrially, this may also result in unfalsifiable research and lack of method and conduct within industrial rules.
Unsuccessful approaches and strategies to future social roles, artefact and information manufacture, and to patterns of explorative research would indicate that they have embraced the potential nihilism of dysfunction.
Seeing such social systems within a nested ecosystem of social relativity between all magnitudes and kinds of containers, in all social strata and between nested sets of rules and agreements that regulated the production of personal and social; artefacts, information and behaviour – a description of a metalanguage of social function may be arrived at for the purpose of modelling.
This language though – is the language of the alien matrix.