EXOPOLITICS AND CONFLICT RESOLUTION
One of the stated aims of the Exopolitical movement, and certainly of its founder Dr Michael Salla is to produce the mechanics of mediation between aggrieved human victims and negative alien behaviours and consequences. The prepare4contact forum of Exopolitics ‘… furthermore emphasizes using peaceful conflict resolution principles and tools both among members, and in relations with extraterrestrial life.’
Here then is an insight into the social science of Conflict Resolution.
This is an example of what we need to see written about by Exopoliticians like Alfred Webre and Dr Salla. Citing the specific mechanics of the various treaties and creating workable pro-human test cases.
The scenario – the case of Mr P S for example – where persistent negative Greys continue a campaign of abuse and harassment, assault and psychological abuse.
As government do not acknowledge any threat to the national interest or find any defence significance that would require legislature, conflict resolution in the case PS v Negative Grey Faction would probably take the form of an Alternative Dispute Resolution.
Here some highly educated PhD or lawyer could come forward to represent the human rights of an individual like Mr PS – using the academic tools of conflict resolution – the exo movement creates a test case …. utilising ADR
Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) (also known as External Dispute Resolution in some countries, such as Australia) includes dispute resolution processes and techniques that fall outside of the government judicial process. Despite historic resistance to ADR by both parties and their advocates, ADR has gained widespread acceptance among both the general public and the legal profession in recent years.
Firstly, How does Mr PS acquire his acknowledgement of his own Human Rights outside the laws of his nation state ? if his nation deny all knowledge, is probably the first question.
The answer probably lies within the legal language of trade not ethics.
International Human Rights Law can be enforced on either a Domestic, Regional or International Level. States that ratify human rights treaties commit themselves to respecting those rights and ensuring that their domestic law is compatible with their international legislation. Customary peremptory norms of International Law that relate to human rights are considered binding on all nations, although the status of such norms is commonly disputed. When Domestic Law fails to provide a remedy for human rights abuses parties may be able to resort to regional or international mechanisms for enforcing human rights.
Such International Human rights law is related to, but not the same as International Humanitarian Law, which regulates armed conflicts and Refugee Law. War crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide may be regulated by international human rights law but each have a substantial body of independent international law.
Violation of the following International treaty by aliens would be required to be established for example. [There are others protecting the International human rights of children]
Here is one likely route to acquire the rights of self-determination and freedom for Mr PS [given the ETs wish to be lawful and can account for themselves]
The United Nations Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment is an international human rights instrument, under the review of the United Nations, that aims to prevent torture around the world.
The Convention requires states to take effective measures to prevent torture within their borders, and forbids states to return people to their home country if there is reason to believe they will be tortured.
The text of the Convention was adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on 10 December 1984 and, following ratification by the 20th state party, it came into force on 26 June 1987. 26 June is now recognised as the International Day in Support of Torture Victims, in honour of the Convention. As of January 2010, 146 nations are parties to the treaty, and another ten countries have signed but not ratified it.
If it can be ruled that the Human Rights of Mr PS have been violated in terms of this UN treaty – then he has a valid dispute with the Aliens.
We would need the help of a lawyer to do this though who was versed in exopolitics and united nations legislation …. there could be issues with blame and liability and the loss of nation state monies via lawsuits
It might be for example that a representative of a nation state government has secretly signed the biological rights of Mr PS over to a multinational corporation engaged in ET trade.
There are trading groups that might source their business from national rather than multinational business and those involved with ETs have ready access to market places everywhere …
This could have happened for example within the remit of The World Trade Organization (WTO) which is an international organization designed by its founders to supervise and liberalize international trade. The organization officially commenced on January 1, 1995 under the Marrakech Agreement, replacing the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), which commenced in 1947.
The World Trade Organization deals with regulation of trade between participating countries; it provides a framework for negotiating and formalising trade agreements, and a dispute resolution process aimed at enforcing participants’ adherence to WTO agreements which are signed by representatives of member governments and ratified by their parliaments. Most of the issues that the WTO focuses on derive from previous trade negotiations, especially from the Uruguay Round (1986-1994).
The dispute with aliens then becomes an issue firstly between Mr PS and the nation state government that signed certain rights in his life over to the corporation engaged in alien trade. Secondly there is a more general issue of the human rights convention against torture.
Nation States could argue that they had no option.
It might be the easiest thing from a Corporate and Government point of view to concede that there was a breach of trust between the two parties that signed the agreement to relinquish rights to their citizens and that an exemption from this agreement can be specifically found for Mr PS given the substantial nature of the grievance. etc
However, holding offices and officers of nation state governments to account is probably impossible [and lethal] given the huge amount of security needs and causes that can specially justify anything they want to do, and what they may have had to do to preserve society as we like to know it. Given that they would not want a test case illustrating their own fiscal liability for compensation – it would – be honest about it – be the wrong thing to attempt and would hold matters up considerably as they postponed and stalled etc.
One better option comes to mind – though better read folks may know many such ..
Enabling an escape route for specifically named individuals or any individuals involved in an imposed alien research process that is demonstrated hideous and detrimental to the integrity of human life, from any trade treaty via proof of human torture according to the 1987 United Nations Convention on Torture would probably be the safest and easiest route that would immediately satisfy all parties.
This would take the form of Alternative Dispute Resolution.
Exopoliticians like Dr Salla are versed in such issues.
ADR is generally classified into at least four types: negotiation, mediation, collaborative law, and arbitration. (Sometimes a fifth type, conciliation, is included as well, but for present purposes it can be regarded as a form of mediation.
In this process there needs to be a Celestial third party.
Negotiation typically manifests itself with a trained negotiator acting on behalf of a particular organization or position. It can be compared to mediation where a disinterested third party listens to each sides’ arguments and attempts to help craft an agreement between the parties. It is also related to arbitration which, as with a legal proceeding, both sides make an argument as to the merits of their “case” and then the arbitrator decides the outcome for both parties.
Mr PS wants the psycho torture to stop at the very least.
What would this faction of Greys have to say for themselves at this point if the trade agreement is ruled for Mr PS – that he is a valid exemption by the International law makers ??
Would the aliens be social or argue against the human national governance and treaty that gave them the human resources or would they argue an alien case for the specific retention of the individual Mr PS.
Who could stop the aliens doing what they want ? Alfred Webre may be stuck in a time loop somewhere and Dr Salla may get held up at the Council of Dolphins in Hawaii. There is though a stronger case for the light filled Angelic realm making a presence felt – though this doesn’t necessarily engage souls via the laws and powers and principalities of the air or land.
Mediation, in a broad sense, consists of a cognitive process of reconciling mutually interdependent, opposed terms as what one could loosely call “an interpretation” or “an understanding of”. The German philosopher Hegel uses the term ‘dialectical unity’ to designate such thought-processes. This article discusses the legal communications usage of the term.
Mediators use appropriate techniques and/or skills to open and/or improve dialogue between disputants, aiming to help the parties reach an agreement (with concrete effects) on the disputed matter. Normally, all parties must view the mediator as impartial.
The mediator would have to get these particular greys to ‘Be Good’ or at the very least to accept the judgment ‘NOT ASSET AS OF XX/YY/XXXX’
In a Collaborative Law case, the parties strive to reach a mutually agreeable, interest-based settlement through a series of meetings, sometimes called joint sessions, between the two parties and their lawyers, and sometimes other neutral experts. Ultimately, each party will judge, or him or herself, whether the terms of the agreement are “fair” to them. The primary focus of the four-way meetings or joint sessions is to identify the priorities, goals, needs and interests of the parties, and help them progress towards and create a settlement that is consistent with their priorities, goals, needs, and interests. The parties make their own decisions based on their own standards.
These Greys may argue e.g. that the human designated asset count officially agreed and acquired equals 524,653,281 [which includes Mr PS]
At which point the case then may be heard in a Celestial Court
Arbitration, a form of alternative dispute resolution (ADR), is a legal technique for the resolution of disputes outside the courts, wherein the parties to a dispute refer it to one or more persons (the “arbitrators”, “arbiters” or “arbitral tribunal”), by whose decision (the “award”) they agree to be bound. It is a settlement technique in which a third party reviews the case and imposes a decision that is legally binding for both sides.
It may be that Mr PS is entitled to damages and that many other pursuants are similarly due renumeration from the reciprocal trade agreement and its human profits, but that is another issue for Exopoliticians to enable. E.g. Mr PS gets refunded his pro-rata share of the engineering program profits his personal life processes enabled to create.
Money though, isn’t everything.
At which point Mr PS chooses, as I did, to be bound by the Highest Court and be saved in Christ, totally immune to the faction of evil Greys and its acquisition processes because the Angels and Saints of Christ, the Holy Spirit then manifested withinin my life and being to fortify my frequencies John 3:8 The wind bloweth where it listeth, and thou hearest the sound thereof, but canst not tell whence it cometh, and whither it goeth: so is every one that is born of the Spirit..