you're reading...

harmonic continuum theory part 3



A New Cosmology.


The cosmos is a foamy place full of soapy bubble. There are little bubbles, big bubbles, dissolving and amalgamating bubbles, bursting bubbles and new bubbles infused with the breath of God at times and scales of magnitude beyond our imagining.


On the iridescent pearly surface of each cosmic bubble are fractal sets of chaotic colourful light matter superclusters absolutely full of life that is full of life.


Inside the bubbles is the air that we cannot see. It is an etheric sea of dark matter energies itself full of life that is full of life and of a differing nature to the life in the structures of the soap.


In such a soapy bubble in a huge soapy foam, is our own little cosmos and somewhere swirling about in the multicoloured patterns of spiralling supercluster soap is our own spiralling supercluster and our own spiral galaxy, called the Milky Way.

As everyone knows in Scotland the Milky Way is actually a low calorie chocolate bar marketed as; ‘the sweet you can eat between meals without ruining your appetite.’

As we now know, the Milky Way chocolate bar is itself made up of atoms that are spiralling that can be arranged in a periodic table of elements that spiral in harmonic patterns.

From that therefore we can guess that infinity is a rather big deal. Goodness knows how many cosmoses we end up eating every time we have some chocolate..

There are forms of consciousness that drift through the air and specialise and adapt to life in it, endlessly blown on the winds of essence. There are forms of consciousness more tied into the life cycle of a cosmic bubble, swirling and thriving in the soapy suds enjoying and being entertained by the colourful patterns as they endlessly dance their endlessly unique parade of material diversity and form.

There are forms of consciousness that are more transient neither connected to the airs of essence nor rooted in the forms of soap.

From this biological and geological planetary analogy which also extends to the internal structure of the cosmos with light matter superclusters of life as we know it on the periphery of the bubble – we can deduce that dark matter and viral lifeforms and primitive formlessness are on the inside amongst the crystal and geology .. a robotic intelligence predating on basic level essence beings.


In the superclusters on the outside of the cosmic bubble, like some Mandelbrot set .. a rich sea of essences and transactions at a more invested level as discussed by biochemist Dr Peter Plichta at the end of his work on chaos theory called ‘God’s Secret Formula’.


The relative proportions of life that is organised as we can identify it may well start with fungal basidiomycetes – primitive basic collectives the forerunner of the massive organisations of the phylum insecta which have to govern the absolute majority of this cosmos.

Insectoid probably being the most common intelligences in this cosmos.

Phylum Hymenoptera – the bees, ants and wasps with its caste system that can include regal and admin, scientists and operants or drones .. intelligent alien life in this cosmos has to primarily derive from insecta or indeed reptilia.

The main proportion maybe about 70% insectoid society with maybe 10% reptilian 15% other and less than 5% humanoid.

A closer look at earths ecology and biomass may yield a more accurate brief.

At the level of individuality, intellectual diversity, quality of creation and recreation the human type with its gender and nurture and social diversity is capable of creating most interesting social investments for a long term group soul.



To further analogize using the cycles observed in the material creation and recreation of stars. First born or primary stars, are hot and  e.g. blue, ultra-blue or indeed may not be visible at all in some ways although they may be a substantial star relative to some other part of another bubble universe in some other foam. New stars have a short life and eventually go supernova and explode, releasing the products of their cycle of physical synthesis as relatively more processed debris.

This because they are newly emerged matter and have material

that is comprised of unstable and chaotic processes.

At the start of the lifecycle of a star where aggregates of debris

are impelled and constrained by gravity to coalesce, an

emergence/fusion reaction kicks in if there is a sufficiently steep

emergence gradient  and pressure from transparent matter, to opaque matter at the locality, here, of the dense matter mass.


These highly temporal and chaotic hot blue star fields are the

product of emergent intrusion from a physically transparent

adjacent bubble in the foam and may incessantly froth and

explode and remain in a chaotic material state. However, they

may eventually emerge slightly cooler green stars by a process

of fusion and by merging such assets as green star materials

together. The processes of gravity and opaque matter gradients

and local material relativity as eventually become supplied for

example may supply a bit of local temporal debris that could

serve as a seed around which to grow new emergence products.

Under these conditions of fusion and emergence, cluster

galaxies may form, fed into by a central fusion reaction or ‘white


The spherical galaxy may continue creating and recreating in a

variable way, but that would not automatically preclude the

cessation of the conditions of emergence and donation from the

other bubble in the foam that was supplying it. The status of

supply of structures may drastically change in these unstable

conditions. The emergence gradient from the adjacent bubble

having dropped off, core stars in this galaxy may re-enter into

adjacent chaos in the other cosmos, whilst other stars on the periphery of the sphere may drift off into this cosmos being excluded from the new equilibrium between emergence and entropy around the changing white hole.

In other aspects of our own universe bubble, energy may be

passing outwith our universe down a variable gradient into

another bubble of variably lesser energy than our own. [a black

hole or an extended tear or worn patch of dissipation in our


Dissipating energy will create a tear or rift in local dense and

opaque matter.

If a galaxy is in this region the densest area of the galaxy may

start to donate matter to the other adjacent lower energy cosmic

bubble down a concentration gradient.

[The biological analogy is osmosis .. diffusion across a restricting semi-permeable membrane]

This stream of local matter will generate large amounts of mass

and energy and will extract this from local stars and galaxies.

This toll material from the latter may also coalesce under great

pressure being sometimes being unable to exit simultaneously

due to the variable gradient conditions imposed by chaos.

Under these circumstances where matter is queuing under

pressure to exit this cosmic bubble – such matter may react

creating explosions from the source of the black hole. E.g. the

ejection of tertiary stars [as noted 2005]


Not necessarily at the centre of a galaxy and not necessarily

relatively black in terms of a gravity well but may be small widely

spread homogenous patches of relatively smaller brown

pores comprised of leaks in the matter and opaque matter ether

of this bubble such that the fabric of the bubble is more resilient

to the local demands in this locality.

Rather like the appearance of a more resistant but porous brown

membrane spread over a galactic cluster than a single black

gravity well at the heart of a galaxy.

There may also be instances of relatively brown holes at the

heart of a galaxy.

This state of affairs may come upon a relatively hot galaxy or it

may come across a relatively cold galaxy.

Eventually, such compacted material of inappropriate relativity

that was kept there by bubble exit pressures – basically ‘suction’

– and now exchanging energy across very steep differentials between cosmii, between new and unstable aggregates and under the new conditions of re-emergence, and reconstruction from its original sources explodes in a state of combustion releasing the stellar material.

If conditions for black hole formation occur in a formerly fusion

fed hot galaxy, there may be green or yellow stars and star

components produced that tend to be fusionable which would

further recombine.

This explosion may also produce enough material for yellow or

green stars that operate by combustion and fission.

There may be however green or yellow stars that are wholly

endowed with processes of fusion.

If conditions for black hole formation occur in a formerly fission

fed cooler galaxy, then its subsequent explosion could also

produce both types of green and yellow stars that use both

fission and fusion.

End products of fission etc are red, brown and black dwarves

that eventually recreate the same physical processes and

conditions operating within a black hole that lead to a further

explosion and the creation of more sophisticated atomic

(tertiary) stardust.

The various transitional states of a red dwarf to black suggest by

analogy that a black hole entropy gradient could be observed in

some forms as the ultimate phase in their cycle.

It may be observed from; the descriptions of black holes, white

holes and emergence gradients between cosmic states of

transparent, opaque and dense matter, and, between aggregates

of our own dense matter atoms by using Fajan’s Rules, that the

processes in the macrocosm look identical to those in the

microcosm except for the labeling notions that the psychology

of magnitude attaches to them.

The macrocosm by analogy is a very slowly moving weather

system, galaxies being the eyes of the energy storm of chaotic


The subsequent; migration of electrons, protons and neutrons,

and the migration of and recycling of fissionable and fusionable

material between black and white holes of relative opposite

polarity and behaviour indicate that the simple transaction model

of A to B through some common C, i.e. from big scale to small

scale across a variable and changing common C is the simple

cornerstone principle of the Universe.


In keeping with the idea that from some other context D some

very large pocket of a different and even greater magnitude of

vast transparency or opaqueness could deliver a very large

newly formed pocket as a small bubble directly adjacent to our

doorstep. As suggested in the atomic scale model, protons,

electrons and even neutrons would migrate to fill it, then this

process may give us a clue as to the eternal creativity of this

Multiverse that we all stay in to make new, baby Universes.

Therein lies the possibility of eternal recombination and strange

new introductions to strange new properties, for much of the

material could come from bubbles adjacent that possessed

incredibly different material behaviour than the properties of

matter currently within our own Universe.



The key to all of this analogy and modeling comes from the

simple deductions about material properties made by Fajan

called Fajan’s Rules. i.e. big to small through common medium.

In a book called Physical Chemistry by GI SMITH.

A very large 15+ volume set on Physical Chemistry from a

technical University bookset however, only produced Soddy-

Fajan in the index.

Although it was clearly not from this planet in its editorial style, it

was very clear that we were not talking about a principle of

transfer between high-energy atoms to low energy atoms.

It remains to be seen, however, what Dr Soddy contributed to

mankind along with Dr Rutherford when in 1902 and 1903, they

produced the theory of ‘radioactivity’.

With Einstein’s ‘special theory of relativity’ in 1905, Planck’s

‘Quantum Theory’ in 1900, then again in 1920, Bohr’s atomic

theory in 1913, by the time 1927 came around, Heisenberg

couldn’t find out what particle anybody was referring to because

particles consistently refused to be found. ‘The principle of

indeterminacy.’ 1927.

With Olbers c.1920’s having claim to something that was holding them  all up somewhere or the sky would be white at night despite

Michelson-Morley’s 1887 dismissal of the theory of ether,

Einstein’s 1905 pronouncement that light ossified at a constant

called ‘c’ was still upheld in the 1930’s and beyond. It was left to

Schwarz and Green in 1984 to lasso Galileo’s 1610 ‘sidereal

messenger’ utilizing the methods and lexicon of Sir Isaac

Newton’s ‘Opticks’ written in 1704 with their theory of ‘Super


Green and Schwartz’s 10 and 26 dimensional string theory,

however, even today, continues to be inconsistent in its own

terms as a sufficient and logical explanation of ‘everything’.

A veritable particle zoo of arbitrary; size, naming, properties,

behaviour of classes, … ‘even conventional elementary particle

physics has problems when it comes to mass. The basic

quantum mechanical rules give no reason as to why mass

should be fixed at all. There seems to be no rule why the mass of

the electron, for example, should not have a whole range of

values. Moreover the various [super strings] symmetry schemes

that were created over the last two decades work best when the

particle masses are zero. Peat DF, ‘Super strings’, p.230.]

Symmetry and labeling ensued that began even in its

nomenclature to mimic the mathematics and behaviour and

torque of turbulence and chaos systems.

Linear mathematical topology began to be twisted and pulled

into ‘twister networks’ and ‘spin networks’ [Peat DF, ‘Super

strings’ pub.1988, Cardinal, ISBN 0-7474-0583-2, P.231-3].

By creating linear algebraic models of particle behaviour in this

turbulence, the mathematics of particle relativity collapsed in

places called ‘gauge fields’ between the different particles.

There, the ‘collapsing wave function’ could only be solved in

mathematical topology by adding a small appendage onto the

ends of the particle model like a ‘weather vane’. E.g. Penrose.

p.270. ‘This measurement problem has been around for 50 years

now ..’ p.271.

It remains to be seen, however, in their study of the torus and

twistor mathematical topographical models, from e.g. 19th

century mathematical topological algebra of Grassmann HG and

Clifford WK, if the super strings mathematicians remember the

basic paradox of the torus presented by Schiffler.

Schiffler’s Horns paradox explains that a joined torus is

impossible and that in fact, all is non-linear chaos.

Green and Schwarz and Gross’s super strings are built out of

‘compactified’ space that allegedly [Peat p.289] compresses 10

and more torus ‘structures’ together. Also to make the theory

more workable, the edges of torus particles somehow need to

connect. In the mathematics of topological chaos, however, a

structure such as a torus doesn’t logically and formally exist.

With even Green and Schwarz now suggesting that some of

these empirical dimensions are ‘not really dimensions at all’,

[Peat, p.320] the underlying assumptions and mathematical

models used to constrain chaotic empiricism into various

regular torus layers are being torn apart.

Super strings, therefore is a dark knotted unfalsifiable cul de sac

of arbitrary labels and fragmented mathematical models.

Chaos is evident everywhere in particle energies, even from the

linear mathematical investigations, where a particle model

performed better because it had mathematical appendages.

These ideas are best seen illustrated in another diagrammatic

representation of Schiffler’s Horns that uses not a torus to

illustrate fractal reality but a representation of a triangle with

appendages that are fractal growths upon it called a Köch Curve.

The side of the triangle is only a point of view from another point

of chaos somewhere in its fractals in the same way that the

incomplete torus of Schiffler is only a point or curve from within

the fractal relativities of the unjoined horns.

Schiffler’s Horns is a direct refutation of the super strings torus


Within the empirically measured energies of the Cosmos there

are many kinds of models and data that would substantiate the

ontology of chaos theory.

This would include a universal and ‘natural’ objectivism and field

theory of emergence based on natural turbulence.

With energy emerging and forcing its way into our ‘dense

matter’, it was left to the most ancient and rejected and

presumably dejected school of scientific ghosts to rattle the

chains behind the brick walls of those lost academic cupboards

of the 19th Century.



Hooper WG, ‘Aether and Gravitation’, pub.1903, Chapman and

Hall, London, writes on page 63, ‘… the atomicity of the aether

has already been suggested by such scientists as Clerk Maxwell,

Lord Kelvin, Dr. Larmour, and Professors Lodge and J.J

Thompson. Clerk Maxwell, in an article on ‘Action at a Distance’,

in collected works by Niven, referring to the atomicity of the

aether writes: ‘its minute parts may have rotatory as well as

vibratory motions, and the axes of rotation may form those lines

of magnetic force which extend in unbroken continuity into

regions which no eye has seen’. ‘Lord Kelvin, in several articles

on ‘Vortex Motion’ in the Philosophical Magazines of recent

years (c.1903), has mathematically dealt with the aether from the

atomic standpoint, and has endeavoured to prove that the aether

medium is composed of vortex rings, but he was unable to come

to any mathematical conclusion.

Presumably the earliest version of Microsoft Windows in 1903,

called Microsoft Windmill had been infected with the ‘annelid

worm’ and had not lived up to the Great Expectations needed for

the massive chaos computations later required for vortices in

the sophisticated academic hallows of third millennium.

Of the field theory that ties the aether together with the

compression of continual emergence, the 1903 data, as available

to Hooper enabled enough perspective to deduce for physical

properties what would later in the coming 100 years be seen to

apply to; Biology, Psychology, Chemistry, Cosmology and Time.

etc. ‘The law of inverse squares which governs not only the law

of gravitation attraction, but also electricity and light, is equally

applicable to the phenomena of heat, so that the intensity of heat

varies inversely as the square of the distance. Thus, if we double

the distance of any body from the source of the heat, the amount

of heat which such a body receives at the increased distance is

one-quarter of the heat compared with its original position. If the

distance were trebled, then the intensity of the heat would be

reduced to one-ninth; while if the distance were four times as

great, the intensity of the heat would only be one-sixteenth of

what it would receive in its first position.’ [Hooper WG, 1903]

Across this chaotic medium, the ether, spinning, rotating and

vibrating, the waves of light and electricity propagate. Attracted

and deflected by larger gravitational masses. Clerk Maxwell, in

his paper on ‘Action at a Distance’ (collected works, by Niven)

writes, ‘ .. in its infinite continuity .. it extends unbroken from star

to star, and when a molecule of hydrogen vibrates in the Dog

Star, the medium receives the impulses of those vibrations, and

transmits them to distant worlds.’ [Hooper WG, 1903, p.59.]

‘Lord Kelvin in giving an address to the British Association,

1901, on ‘Clustering of Gravitational Matter in any part of the

Universe.’ said: ‘we are convinced with our President (Professor

Rucker) that Aether is matter. Aether we relegate to a distinct

species of matter which has inertia, rigidity, elasticity,

compressibility, but not heaviness.’

One hundred years later, in the third millennium, Professor

Higgs, the Scientific Community and the ‘Massless Vector

Boson’ that may solve the mathematical chaos of super strings

and the quest for interplanetary resources, are still beyond help.

Faraday in [Hooper, 1903] writes, (Exp. Res., vol. ii.); ‘The view

now stated of the composition of matter would seem to involve

the conclusion that matter fills all of space, or at least all space

to which Gravitation extends, including the sun and its system,

for Gravitation is a property of matter dependable on a certain

force, and it is this force which constitutes matter. Aether must

also be matter.’

Hooper in 1903, an objectivist to the end states ‘for example, the

laws which govern the light and heat of the sun are the same

which govern the light and heat of a candle or a glow-worm; and

the laws which govern a planet or world are the same as those

which govern an atom. Thus a planet or world, which is simply

an agglomeration of atoms, may reveal to us in its motions and

laws, what are the motions and laws which govern the atomic


The laws of attraction and repulsion as stated by Newton and the

laws of planetary attraction, conservation of momentum, for

every action there is an equal and opposite reaction etc, belong

to an era bereft of massive computational analysis.

Although numerous empirical regimes from the famous Lord

Kelvin and Boyle, whose gas laws and studies of turbulence

would have been major scientific advances had they a version of

Windows 95 – the main theories on aether, although very feasible

would be doomed without a driving and causal engine – the

engine of emergence.

Factors noted by [Hooper, 1903] as Centripetal and Centrifugal

forces without a chaos-driven emergence model to drive the

‘antigravity’ or out-throw of the centrifugal forces being

measured would fail in ‘gravitational collapse’.

‘Here, then, is presented to us a kind of order of celestial

phenomena for whose well-being and effectual working the

centripetal force or the attraction of gravitation cannot possibly

count. In their case another force is demanded which shall be

the exact complement and counterpart of the centripetal force.

There needs therefore a force, not an imagined one … a force

existing in each world just like the attraction of gravitation, only

the reverse of gravitation, a repellant, repulsive force, acting in

the reverse mode and way, to universal attraction. This force

must be governed by the same rules and laws that govern

centripetal force if it is to work in harmony with the same.’

[Hooper, 1903, p.31.]

Beyond, Kelvin’s ideas, though was the [‘Spherical Vortex Atom

Phil. Trans, 1894] of Professor Hill in Hooper, p.62 … ‘ in the

conception there put forward, and mathematically worked out,

Professor Hill showed that his spherical vortex atom possessed

similar properties and characteristics to the vortex rings of

Kelvin.” … that atom would; rotate, be a magnet, possess

elasticity, compressibility, inertia, … and … a certain amount of



Instead of Rutherford, Soddy and Planck c.1900 – 1903 with

billiard balls held together by c.1980’s ‘gluons’ whilst radiating

quantum shells – there is instead a deluge of energy

compressing into various packets of various sizes between

which and within which are gradients of varying velocities and


The frequency of transaction across the density and resistance

within each packet is relatively driven in time with emergence

and its field strength in any temporal locality.

At high frequency and low resistance gradients there are many

atomic shells.

The Structural and scalar persistence and ongoing integrity of

atomic localities are due to resonance between; emergence and

frequency driven, pattern-based structural interdependencies.

These aggregates of simples and complexes are continually fed

by the compaction energies of emergence.

Highly facilitative, rigorous and highly structural postponements

amongst driven interstitial elements e.g. in diminishing order of

scale; neutrons, protons and electrons, incorporate self-sufficiency and relative immunity to emergent driving. At which

point they begin to mirror and more accurately reflect the

gradient products and bi-products that they have been initially

attracting by difference in energy potential. [i.e. from High to Low

energy in this particular packet of ether in which atoms are in


This would eventually develop into a ‘dance of symmetry’ that

would then attract a greater scale of focus of these initial

components, down an increasingly steeper gradient at time1.

If the flow continues to keep the ether pockets supplied in

excess, therefore, it will be possible for inanimate matter to


At this scale of atomic complexity, two symmetrically entwined

systems that are; compacted, fed by steady and dependable

gradient, that are interacting and mutually interfering with their

integrities – may in this turbulence, be able to impart a notion of

scale and symmetry to a third amount of supplied material thus

creating a new and similarly-scaled particle performing to local

ratios of transference.

The energies of matter interact through the physical transactions

of constructive and destructive interference. The propagation of

the transverse waves in variably dense and turbulent media by

harmonic and vibratory motion is driven by emergence and

dissipated by entropy.

The rules of Quantum Physics [QED] do not regulate particle

sizes in Quantum Shells [Peat DH] so this does entail that it is

the transaction that the particle facilitates at time1, rather than

its scale that would classify it in a periodic table.

‘In Newland’s Law of Octaves in 1864, he arranged all the

elements he knew in ascending order of relative atomic mass

and assigned to the elements a series of ordinal numbers which

he called atomic numbers. He then noticed that elements with

similar chemical properties had atomic numbers that differed by

seven or some multiple of seven.

In other words, Newland discovered that the chemical properties

of elements were often to be similar for every eighth or sixteenth

element, like the notes in octaves of music.’ [Brown GI,

‘Introduction to Physical Chemistry, SI Edition pub. 1972, ISBN

0-582-32131- X]

The process of emergence, drives the facilitative structure of

particles by compressing and feeding the shells across and

through variously dense but persistent, pockets of ether across

an inconsistent but relative transaction gradient.

This will drive the formation and concretion and cohesion of the

particles whilst their elasticity is being continually challenged by

constant change. [Hennessey’s Rules, 2004]

In these circumstances, particle opportunities are; persistent,

temporary and generic and non-generic.

Resonance Hybrids of these generically similar atomic states

interact ‘electronically’ in variously indescribable ways. e.g.1

‘No single structural formula which can be written for benzene,

for example, accounts for all the known properties of benzene,

and this is so for many other compounds.’ [Brown, p.185], and,

‘Ingold introduced the description of these chaotic interactions

as mesomeric states or mesomerism i.e. ‘between the parts’.

In this chaos, atomic structure itself will shift about and

elastically self-regulate, creating different atomic structures e.g.

tautomerism in classical chemistry, or, also driven to mutate,

grow or decay into some other element by emergence, density

and turbulence gradients within the ether.

According to Böhr [1904], Rutherford’s spinning electrons didn’t

fly away expelled by centrifugal activity – they couldn’t escape

because they were locked into stationary stasis.

Plichta P, pub. Element 1997 ‘God’s Secret Formula –

Deciphering the riddle of the universe and the prime number

code’ ISBN 1-86204-014-1, attempts to account for such disintegrity in gauge field spaces with a system of mathematical

prime numbers.

He also produces from this an inference that good things come

in threes e.g. egg, larvae, insect, or base, sugar, phosphate, but

his tripartite theory incorporates the ‘a priori’ assumption of

Planck and Einstein, of fixed; neutrons, protons and electrons,

and that the relationships between these are governed, and

regulated by concepts within definite mathematical space of a

relatively planar Sierpinski Triangle. [a fractal device]

[Another equivalent of Schiffler’s Horns in Super strings theory

or indeed the Koch Curve.]

To quote Plichta, 1997, page 194, ‘.. in reality, so many atoms

collide with each other simultaneously in a gas-filled space that

nobody would ever get the idea that the kinetics of colliding gas

atoms in principle only involve dual collisions and thus yes-no

decisions. The space they occupy thus behaves mathematically

like the grid space that can be described by Pascal’s Triangle.’


I would disagree with Plichta’s strategy for mapping such particles though as it dies not allow for modalities and transitional processes.

I have developed  a modal logic called [A] that would do for that.


Energy is being continually forced into atomic structures,

although continually mutating in a relative harmonic field by

degrees of; folding, gradient and compaction into any recipient

etheric pocket. The atomic field at time1 in this packet of atoms

is regulated by ether density, and the transaction gradient at

time1 is driven by harmonic vibration which, depending on the

frequency and the substrate will have several harmonic shells.

The forces of ‘gravitational’ compaction at the heart of the

particle may vary, but they will contribute to the degree of

expulsion that gives shape to the atomic structure at time2.

The forces of attraction called gravity – a passive idea, therefore,

are in truth, the forces of compaction – an active concept.


Isaac Newton’s apple was in fact pushed down from the sky by a

process interruption in the massive scales of carbon within the

tree, where the massive abnormal scaling differences between

the branch and the ground enabled a massive high velocity

transfer with very little impedance to convey it to the ground.

The ethnocentric vision of good things falling into our laps to

uphold our lifestyle without taking care of our orchards and what

shoots they may push up next year has haunted us for millennia.

Hooper’s analogies and rustic charm of the straws and the

whirlpools were more grounded in reality than one hundred

years of pointless hitek cider.

Work done is done by entropy against new emergence at time2

and self-regulating cohesion and its innate distribution. This

turbulence at time1 by entropy supplies adjacent particle


This supply, however, cannot be explained by the models of the

last 100 years. e.g. Planck’s ‘shells’ are ‘visualised’ [Brown,


With relative sizes of shells and their distance being dictated by external pressures and bigger factors in the sub-atomic cosmos then Planck’s constant i.e. the fixed distance between electron shells was not going to remain so.

At time1, interplay between molecules is driven by an emergence

gradient of created and recreated energy and matter coming in and emerging from the background sea of sub-atomic chaos and adjacent dark matter and cosmii. This via – a mediated transaction of higher to lower, e.g. osmosis, Fajan,

Ohm across a common medium of local energy/chemical conditions.

The compaction pressures created by emergence, itself a chaotically driven process would vary.

Compaction and slewing off of particles from atoms by

turbulence is a self-regulating equilibrium. When and if the

velocity of the emergent energies of compaction slows, the

bigger particles will donate energy [Fajan, 1924]. This donation

will be mediated and impeded by particle size and number of

shells and other gradients and demands within the adjacent

etheric turbulence.

The normalizing factor on scale and density of atomic structure

is the relative density and consistency of the local ether.

The fundamental attributes of atomic structure will remain the

same in etheric context at any scale of local etheric context.

e.g. in a state of unity of cosmological chaos, ether may be so

relatively (‘impossibly’) and (‘incredibly’) distorted as to produce

a carbon atom the size of a football within a restricted set of

circumstances that have penetrated from some lateral plane of

scale. In terms of the current Quantum Theory [QED] one could

get some very large particles in the wrong place.

Stark and Zeeman noticed that energy levels, and magnitude of

‘electricity’ in these shells altered and varied according to the

lines of force in a field. This force depended on the velocity of

interaction within and between the atomic composites and

aggregates. The subsequent augmentation or detraction called

‘quantum yield’ however, will not be universally quantifiable as a

law at any given time, or all of time.

Continual turbulence will slew away excess energy and ether

that the atoms or its crystalline or state structures cannot hold

on to at any given time.

Under the normative forces of emergence, however, where

compaction is very consistent over time, inanimate matter may

through over supply of similarities of the same ratios, replicate


The equilibrium and bias caused by the velocity of the

emergence gradient and driven across some value of normative

ether, causes harmonic intervals ‘atomic shells’.

These are continually supplied by emergence to retain the

elasticity and persistence within Simple Harmonic Motion [SHM].

Peter Plichta, the industrial chemist noted in 1997, in ‘God’s

Secret Formula’ that sophisticated carbon-based molecules (e.g.

hexagonal ring structures, pentagonal ring structures etc)

seemed a natural priority, but spoke in terms of the ‘strict

divisions’ p39, and absolutes, p.32. as his model would dictate.

His brilliant exposition of the chemical morphology of life,

however on page 200 and 201 of his book illustrates his true

genius in Chemistry.

Plichta discovers that the arithmetic of atomic harmony has a

direct and formative influence on the nature and structure of

matter and material evolution.

This relates the threeness in the chemistry of life between the

two main classes of life form on this planet: the vertebrates and

the invertebrates.

e.g. the insect evolved in three geological ages: the

Carboniferous, the Permian and the Upper Cretaceous. Its life

cycle, finalised 65 million years ago, takes the form of; egg,

larvae, insect – in the morphology of: head, thorax and abdomen.

This insect life upon whose activities at the bottom of the food

chain, the trophic pyramids of carnivorous and omnivorous

vertebrates are based – is comprised and founded on mainly of

hexagonal carbon ring structures.

The vertebrates with: head, torso and the extremities, also have

tripartite reproductive nesting in their life cycle. e.g. egg, sac,


Plichta noted p.201 ‘.. I suspected that life on this planet could be

mathematically subject to the conditions of two forms of space.

If a flying insect is compared with a flying animal .. e.g. a swallow

– it can be shown that both are built to suit the space in which

they happen to live.

The structure and the function of the insect incorporates threedimensional gas-filled space..’

I would disagree with that, as the swarm model by Langton at

Santa Fe simplifies this behaviour to a 2-dimensional algorithm.

It does suggest, to the contrary, that insects are incorporated

within 2-dimensional space operating in relation to stimuli within

3 dimensions, as indeed is the swallow in his example.

Plichta continues, ‘A swallow is constructed entirely differently.

It has no armour of hexagonal sugar – instead it has a skeleton

made of inorganic carbon salts.’

The common architecture of ‘swarm’ refers to a large number of

simple agents interacting, whether they are a swarm of bees, an

ant colony, a flock of birds, or cars in city traffic. Agents – with

their own internal data and rules – act by passing messages back

and forth to each other. The system also provides a field object

to associate the agents with co-ordinates in space. The agents

can modify the environment and in turn their behaviour is

dictated by the state of the environment, providing a feedback

loop. ‘We are attempting to capture the architecture in a general-purpose way,’ says Langton. ‘Then people modeling insect behaviour, the economy, the behaviour of molecules getting caught up in complex dynamics, or the evolution of populations can go to the same simulator and not worry about a lot of very subtle computer science and engineering issues.’

Langton in [Santa Fe Institute Bulletin, Fall, 1993, vol8, no.2 page


The end-based telic principle of the incremental complexity and

diversity of life and the predation and grazing between scales of

sophistication – his ‘zoological perspective’ does ring true


Rupert Sheldrake in his ‘a new science of life – the hypothesis of

formative causation’ pub.1985, Paladin, ISBN 0-586-08583-1

page.95 ..’ Time after time when atoms come into existence

electrons fill the same orbitals around the nuclei; atoms

repeatedly combine to give the same molecular forms; again and

again molecules crystallize into the same spatial patterns; seeds

of a given species give rise year after year to plants of the same

appearance; generation after generation, spiders spin the same

types of web. Forms come into being repeatedly, and each time

each form is more or less the same. On this fact depends our

ability to recognize, identify and name things.

This constancy and repetition would present no problem if all

forms were uniquely determined by changeless physical laws or

principles.’ [Sheldrake, p.95]

Sheldrake does not believe, however, that these laws are

testable – as they would have to account for the prior and

automatic evolution of DNA – hence his morphogenetic field

hypothesis of formative causation.

[T] relativity explains the changeless laws of transaction such

that DNA automatically emerges at the end of a telic emergence

chain that compresses the ether into atoms, that then drives

them into complex self-regulating arrangements of transitional

polymers, then further compresses them, if time will allow, into

self replicating autonomous processes that are capable of

crossing the energy barriers presented by scale to emerge into

and exploit new material circumstances.

Kauffman S in Levy S ‘Artificial Life’, pub. Penguin 1992, ISBN 0-

14-023105-6, P.136 demonstrates the emergence of selfregulating

long chain polymers from such a primordial soup.

Kauffman S, ‘Origins of order: self-organization and selection in

evolution.’, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992) or adapted in

‘Antichaos and adaptation’, Scientific American, August 1991,

pp. 78-85. are other presentations of Kauffman’s discoveries.

In [T] relativity, the attributes of scaling presented by physical

chemistry would present a created sea of emergent atoms

[macro], being driven and compacted into more complex

molecular activity around the transitional, hybrid and interstitial

values within the periodic table of chemistry.

The diversity of the carbon ring structures e.g. Benzene as

previously stated in [Brown GI, 1972] are not yet fully


By analogy with biological feeding.

Two systems being over-fed and over-substantiated at time1

interacting and exchanging mutual interference, introduced to a

new amount of symmetrical aggregate at time2 will be able to

influence and drive the symmetrical construction of a substantial

third copy at time3 by sympathetic resonance if conditions

amongst the atomic persist.

Upscaling to carbon-based life forms of massively complex

aggregates and massively complex postponements of

discharge, because of massively complex chemical

topographies – there would be sufficient postponement of

entropy for a more perfect reproductive symmetry to develop

[e.g. chaos driven foetus] in this model.

Information Exchange is analagous to energy exchange in


It may be said that in the interests of efficiency that intelligence

appears to have a high opinion of itself – as Langton’s Swarm

Model at Santa Fe and the many other simulations within

Complexity Studies would suggest.

Within behaviourism, for example, the physical data that upholds

the perceptions of; arts, philosophy and society can be

attributed to the dichotomies presented within territorial and

breeding displays between and within species.

It is not to be said, however, that I am immediately looking for a

pile of bananas or running away from high voltages.

It has to be suggested therefore that within my macroscale

etheric packets emerging from myself are evolutionary spaces

devoid of alcohol or other biological placebo in which other

priorities emerge that do not distort and break up social


I consider myself to have a soul with a ‘fictional finalism’ [Adler

A] of a unified society.



Using the Tesla theory of grand unity called the theory of

environmental energy, I will outline the mechanism by which

Jupiter could become a nova.

With our current understanding of Cosmology and physics, the

following theory could be termed pseudo science. However in a

world where scientists like Hawking and Dawkins regularly meet to discuss the impending defeat of the paradigm my theory performs what science methodologist and philosopher of science Karl Popper calls in his 1962 publication ‘Conjectures and Refutations’ – a bold conjectural leap.

All that is needed for it to suffice as a scientific model is for it to

predict and if necessary be falsified and discarded if it fails to meet its own criteria for a theory.

Such diligence could never have been applied to the Big Bang

theory – a dinosaur well past its sell by date patently ignoring its

own refutations for decades. e.g. the Great Wall a strip of galaxies in the super cluster contains matter far older than the date of the origins of the universe calculated by the Big Bang. [Lerner, 1992]

My prediction makes several assumptions already made and

practiced by Tesla in his Theory of Environmental Energy 1910 in

that energy pours into the cosmos from the ether, supplying new

particles and mutating others into newer and bigger atoms and

particles. Whilst its known and approved opposite force entropy

degrades and creates newer and smaller atoms and particles.

The supply of new energy into the universe from the chaos of the

subatomic ether is called the law of emergence. This law has been  much studied and modeled at the Santa Fe Institute by Kauffman, Langton, and at the Neurosciences Institute by Edelmann and at Cambridge, England by Goodwin.

All of these scientists can model the fact that order emerges from  chaos and in fact recombines and degrades and then rebuilds itself into some complex and structured equilibrium. This can illustrate that the universe grows and regulates complex matter.

e.g. Kauffman’s ‘Self-regulating auto catalytic polymers’ model.

Emergence and entropy act synergistically to create and recreate

new end based systems.

Contrary to the second law of thermodynamics that predicts that

matter continually and forever breaks down into minute and

homogenous pieces, emergence is the other side of the coin – it

drives structural re-assembly.

Kauffman has demonstrated the recombinative power of

emergence in his ‘self regulating auto catalytic polymer model’ at the Santa Fe institute. [www.santafe.edu]

New energies have been noted in the form of dark matter – pouring into this cosmos creating surplus, [New Scientist], whilst as far back as 1920, Olbers noted that if there was no ether the night sky would be white because all of the photons in the cosmos should be here by now.

It can only be ether that keeps our night sky dark by acting as an

impedance to the passage of photons.

Ether, Emergence and Wave theory, in the context of fluid

dynamics were explored as early as 1901 by Lord Kelvin with his

vortex theory of ether – but it was the assumption of Einstein to the impoverished throne of disunity in the early 20th Century that took mankind away from the fluid dynamics model of energy.

Recent cosmologists and high energy physicists have created ‘sub atomic ether/plasma’ by boiling up particles into a fission driven gluon soup – but the reality of natural fusion is largely ignored in a world view dominated by disintegration, fission and entropy.

Against the backdrop of emergence, which is a largely ignored and unexplored law of chaos science – new kinds of physical theories of the cosmos can come into being. When combined with fluid dynamics and turbulence studies they provide the essence of a wave based physical theory of the cosmos.

The following conjecture about the possibility of fusion

within Jupiter assumes that matter is being continually created and uses Tesla’s 1910 Theory of Environmental Energy with which to predict, borrowing no paradoxes from 20th century physics.

Recent astronomy has provided evidence of distant solar systems containing hot, gas giant planets akin to Jupiter in Earth’s solar system.

I intend to speculate that by the laws of symmetry and self-assembly within the duality of matter and energy that all physical

systems tend to reproduce and grow. From this reasoning I

speculate that all solar systems with gas giants

tend to become binary star systems.

How though could Jupiter ever become a binary star for our Sun

given its presumed state of low energy as calculated by our current  and prevalent physics?

I will present a trigger mechanism for Jupiter based on Tesla’s


Jupiter has a centre of gravity, most probably a seed rock around which the gasses and liquids have then gathered. Jupiter is comprised of predominately non-metallic elements many of which could be compressed by gravity into superconductors around the core.

Into this planetary atomic environment comes the energy of the

subatomic ether channeled through the centre of gravity at the

planets core.

Earth’s centre of gravity has been reported to be an electrostatic


It has been reported by mythology that there is a crackling,

smoking electrical sun at the heart of the Earth [‘The Smokey God’].

The ether is in and around all atoms and all particles as the ether

directly drives their very existence as standing waves in etheric

turbulence. Much like the red spot in the eye of Jupiter – particles are harmonic storm systems directly linked to the medium from which they emerge. Harmonic attributes and arithmetic are constantly to be found even amongst cover-ups like quantum theory and super strings.

Most of the emergent force however would be focused at the

planetary centre of gravity, more so than at the periphery of the

mass of the planet.

Through the core of Jupiter comes the force and energy that drives the creation of new particles and atoms and this force will seek to radiate out beyond the planets surface, dissipating as a creative force as it gets beyond the planetary mass and atomic and particulate ingredients.

The force of emergence, brings new energies and subatomic

particles into Jupiter through its core and will alter, mutate and

grow the atoms at the planets core.

This will have created over vast time, semi-metallic transitional

elements around the seed rock of Jupiter, like a very porous skin

comprised of several kilometers of inconsistent semi-metallic

atomic aggregates.

These semi-metallic elements will act like a capacitor, holding the suns electrostatic charge and creating a huge potential difference or voltage between the core and the semi-metallic skin.

What would usually happen because of the electro-porous nature of the skin, is that the variation in the force of emergence and the variation in the Sun’s electromagnetic output that the amount of charge held by the leaking semi-conductor would tend to dissipate?

When, however, the electromagnetic output of the sun is unusually high e.g. now.. where most of the planets in the solar system are currently warming up, less of the electrostatic charge around Jupiter’s core will leak away and will build up a massive potential difference between the skin and the core.

When the charge in the semi-metallic skin reaches a critical

threshold under these new solar conditions it will or could cause a change of state in its constituents overcoming the physical and atomic constraints to its discharge and will forcibly discharge its massive voltage triggering a cold fusion reaction in Jupiter’s core.

Jupiter will then, I predict, follow in the footsteps of other binary

star solar systems by self-assembling itself into a fusion driven

binary star.

Another twist to this tale and all the what if’s is that IF this theory

predicts correctly then there is another problem with Jupiter that

needs urgent seeing to.

As an entity involved in fusion Jupiter tends to the light metallic

end of the spectrum but in the year 2001 it was hit by a comet

comprised wholly of Plutonium – a very heavy metal.

This comet was not Shoemaker-Levy number 9 in 1999 but in the

order of Shoemaker-Levy 12-14. The hit of the plutonium asteroid

was in 2001 and was announced by Peter Sissons on BBC UK

Evening News as an ‘and finally’ item towards the end of the


With a large amount of heavy metal plutonium in the fusion mixture  – Jupiter could easily get indigestion, creating not only fusion but fission reactions driven by the extreme weight of the Plutonium.

Jupiter might not only be a nova – but potentially could also

explode and eject matter into the solar system creating havoc

amongst the planets.

The presence of a large amount of heavy metal salts could

potentially be disruptive and antagonistic as the elements engaged  in fusion would have been primarily lighter.

Some may say that maybe hostile aliens more than aware of the

physics of Tesla attempted to destroy the solar system by asteroid attack.

The solution though is relatively simple too – a massive injection of transitional elements such as carbon and iron into the fusion

mixture – before it fires itself into life.

This maybe gives us 10 years to fix the problem before the solar

activity predicted by the Mayans creates the possibility of fusion in Jupiter.

We can treat the planets explosive indigestion with a dose of

carbon – probably with about 100 – 1000 times the mass of

Plutonium that went into Jupiter.

I’m sure there’s plenty pure transitional elements floating about

nearby in the asteroid belt.

To conclude then, by our current world view of physics, none of the above is possible, but then there is no theory in today’s physics apart from Tesla’s that could explain the interstellar craft that currently flood into our camcorders.

Thus far I have been totally unsuccessful finding confirmation of

that Shoemaker Levy 12-14 plutonium comet in 2001 – and I’ve

been looking and asking the usual suspects.

Another ironic note is that the comet hit in 2001 – very Arthur C

Clarkesque … but in Clarke’s sequel 2012 also a film, Jupiter

becomes a binary star. It doesn’t go supernovae in the film though – that one has a happy ending.

I think, personally, that someone is trying to tell us something ….



About ScottishAndrew

Contemporary Scottish fiddle player, Scottish ceilidh dance caller, folk music composer, Ufologist, natural and supernatural photographer and tour operator, digital artist and designer, writer and columnist - interested in cosmology and 5th generation computation without the 'Halting problem' !! THE SCOTTISH ANDREWVERSE Ceilidh musician and man of dance Investigator of paranormal circumstance Composer of art and pictures and tunes And researcher of old Scottish stones and runes Cosmic conundrums and landing on the Moon ...


No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 265 other followers

Flickr Photos

%d bloggers like this: